Search for: "In Re CDA"
Results 21 - 40
of 286
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2022, 9:16 am
In this context, Classmates is the content creator and is not entitled to immunity under the CDA. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 11:36 am
What the court is really saying is that Amazon has to police the vendors…and we’re back to the “monitoring” obligation the court says Amazon doesn’t have. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am
Defendants own and control multiple pornography websites without verifying age and consent of persons appearing in the content; review all content on their websites; harvest and analyze user data, including searches and video views; tag, categorize, and otherwise optimize content for user preferences, including Jane Doe #1’s content by tagging it “Lil”; give bonuses to moderators based on the number of videos approved (instead of blocked); discourage moderators from removing… [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:36 am
So the opening up of the door to looking at a site’s knowledge will be something that we haven’t seen before, and because of that we’re going to have a lot of questions. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 11:52 am
The claims are based on Twitter’s alleged failure to remove the third-party videos, which is preempted by Section 230 (including a cite to In re Facebook, discussed below). [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 2:09 pm
They’re right. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 3:56 am
The applicant and Mr Allad appealed their convictions and in March 2014, both appeals were allowed with the result that the convictions and sentences were quashed, and a re-trial was ordered. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm
The State Board of Stock Inspection Commissioners is required to promulgate rules to implement this process; The bill prohibits the re-sale of an animal or animal share by the consumer; and The seller is not liable in a civil action for damages caused by inadequate cooking or improper preparation for consumption. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 5:00 pm
With the start of a new Congress, more bills are expected to be introduced (or re-introduced) soon. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 5:00 pm
With the start of a new Congress, more bills are expected to be introduced (or re-introduced) soon. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:50 am
And Eric Goldman explains well how CDA 230 conveys civil procedure advantages that the First Amendment does not. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:49 am
And Eric Goldman explains well how CDA 230 conveys civil procedure advantages that the First Amendment does not. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 4:00 am
During the NAFTA re-negotiations, the Trump Administration pressed for the elimination import restrictions but in talks that went into the into the final hours, Canada was able to preserve its vital pillar for the supply management system. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 2:48 pm
But there is also a certain disingenuousness to simply replying “they’re private firms, they can do whatever they want” to claims of censorship on the right. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 7:52 am
” (If you’re confused by how constructive public trusts could apply to this context, trust me, you’re not the only one). [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:40 pm
The online community was outraged by the passage of the CDA. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:27 am
The Supreme Court declined yesterday to review the scope of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), which gives online platforms immunity from civil liability for third-party content on their services. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 1:31 pm
This new sentence could cover various editorial actions that are a routine part of online publishing today, dramatically re-labeling service providers as “information content providers” and thereby removing immunity from such providers. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 1:31 pm
This new sentence could cover various editorial actions that are a routine part of online publishing today, dramatically re-labeling service providers as “information content providers” and thereby removing immunity from such providers. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 12:15 pm
The post New copyright registration option for bloggers; AT&T’s opinion on CDA §230; questions about YouTube’s anti-hate rules appeared first on Socially Aware Blog. [read post]
