Search for: "In Re Condemnation of Lands" Results 21 - 40 of 693
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2007, 10:27 pm
Also, re-channeling redevelopment through market actors would reduce grandiose and wasteful redevelopment schemes. [read post]
24 Dec 2006, 7:28 am
"They're gonna do it," her brother said.Her stomach churned. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 12:56 pm by Biersdorf & Associates
  Many property owners in this situation recognize the significance of their loss; when the land is taken, they’re losing land that would have been very valuable to them after the project is complete. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 1:58 pm by Brad Kuhn
Every once in a while, infrastructure projects we’re working on involve traversing Indian lands. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm by admin
The Relevance and Admissibility of Rezoning and Comparable Sales Occurring After the Date of Taking, When Determining the Value of Condemned Property by Alan T. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:54 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Here, however,"the plaintiff does not allege the City's announcement of an intention to condemn or its promise to re-file the condemnation action somehow reduced the value of the Property. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 11:35 pm
When must a landowner challenge a land use regulation she claims illegally impact her property? [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 4:28 pm by Howard Bashman
“Supreme Court Backs Pipeline in Case on New Jersey Land Seizures; By a 5-to-4 vote, the court said the federal government could delegate its power to condemn state property to a private company”: Adam Liptak has this article in today’s edition of The New York Times. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 3:15 am by Wally Zimolong
  On the other hand, an inverse condemnation or regulatory taking occurs when the government takes some action that restricts the use of the land in such a way as to severely impact it beneficial economic use. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 9:21 am by J. Ross Pepper
The jury in the Shelby County case returned a verdict based on the land being condemned being worth $25,000 per acre, which was much closer to the value per acre as to which the land owner’s experts had testified than as to which the county’s experts had testified. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Here's what we're reading today: Debating the Constitutinality of New York's Blight Condemnations - lawprof Ilya Somin, via Volokh. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 6:53 am by Alan Ackerman
Now, the Oneida County Industrial Development Agency wants to condemn the land to build a factory. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 1:16 pm by WIMS
Instead, it asks the Appeals Court to hold that California's public trust rights become "quiescent" while the United States owns the land but will "re-emerge" if the United States seeks to transfer the Property to a private party. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 12:00 am by Carlos Kelly
  On appeal, and ultimately on motion for re-hearing, the First DCA held the legal test for inverse condemnation obligated the plaintiffs to allege “FWC required them to submit to a temporary or permanent physical occupation of their land or…enacted a regulation or imposed a condition that completely deprived them of all economically beneficial use of their land. [read post]
14 May 2021, 5:09 am
I did the same, wonder why they're not criticizing me? [read post]
  Res judicata did not bar circuit court’s review of inverse condemnation claim - via the Michigan Township Law Blog. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 5:42 am by David Snyder
  The School Board first attempted to condemn land in 2010. [read post]