Search for: "In Re Dworkin"
Results 21 - 40
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2007, 11:20 am
And of course Slaw readers will remember Justice Bertha Wilson’s use of Dworkin’s analytical approach in Re Residential Tenancies Act, 1981 CanLII 24, R. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
I reject, said Dworkin, both “finding the law just there in history” and “making it up wholesale in accordance with what you think it should be. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:59 am
"They're handling this food for the whole public, including Grandma and young children and pregnant women. [read post]
26 May 2014, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Paul Horwitz, 'A Troublesome Right': The 'Law' in Dworkin's Treatment of Law and Religion, (Boston University Law Review, Forthcoming).Michael A. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 3:30 am
And if they’re all victims, then what else could OnlyFans be but their pimp? [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 11:36 am
First, we’re getting a bit tired of Evony searches. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
On the other hand, and now in favor of this particular new book, I would say that Sunstein’s “return to the sources” is interesting, because it allows us to re-encounter the "old Sunstein", who had made excellent contributions to law. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:40 pm
I begin by reviewing the works of Ronald Dworkin, Jeremy Waldron, and Bruce Ackerman. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 8:51 am
As a crucible through which to test these two interpretive projects and their view of the judicial role, I discuss the recent opinion of the Supreme Court of California, In re Marriage Cases (2008), in which the court ruled that California's constitution required opening up civil marriage to same-sex couples. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
Next up are some questions from Evan Bernick:EB: You’re a liberal. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Dworkin’s critics often said that in his hands, the methodology was mostly about justification (i.e., a reflection of the moral principles to which Dworkin subscribed) and insufficiently about fit, but the approach can be understood apart from how Dworkin himself applied it.Not just Ely’s representation-reinforcement, but most of the leading constitutional theories are coherentist. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Dworkin’s critics often said that in his hands, the methodology was mostly about justification (i.e., a reflection of the moral principles to which Dworkin subscribed) and insufficiently about fit, but the approach can be understood apart from how Dworkin himself applied it. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 8:46 am
Vermeule notes that Dworkin never once wrestled with the problem of administrative law or the administrative state. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 1:27 pm
Hart, Dworkin, and Sunstein to follow the argument. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 9:16 am
Dworkin v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 10:28 pm
Taking Ronald Dworkin and Jeremy Waldron as a point of departure, the paper contends that procedural and substantive democrats approach democracy at the level of daily governance (which has to do with the adoption of ordinary laws and the administration of a state's bureaucratic apparatus) as if it exhausted the democratic ideal. [read post]
4 May 2008, 10:06 am
I was busy reading Rawls and Dworkin and Marx and &tc., &tc. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 3:51 am
And I'm looking forward to seeing Anthony Dworkin, editor of the Crimes of War site - it's been a couple of years (!) [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
They’re good, very good. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:15 pm
(BTW, telling us what Rawls or Dworkin would think about your subject is now incredibly passe. [read post]
