Search for: "In Re Estate of Breyer"
Results 21 - 40
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2009, 7:32 am
(Kennedy Estate v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:10 pm
Sorry, but you’re way off. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:58 pm
But the great drawback is that you’re stuck with your representative. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 10:16 am
Breyer concurred in judgment but warned again, you can’t possibly mean this is true. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:17 pm
STEWART: We’re not aware of any, unless you include the trademark analogue to this provision. . . . [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 5:26 pm
(RAB), a multiemployer bargaining association for the New York real-estate industry. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:44 pm
Justices have more confidence in how they thought about © for themselves, especially with Breyer and Ginsburg. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm
If so, that judgment would be the first final judgment in the matter and would thereby have a preclusive effect under principles of res judicata on the later Texas judgment in Pierce's favor. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 7:37 am
In re N.M. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 6:57 am
Justice Stephen Breyer asked what would happen if “bankruptcy judges somewhere say we want to start court at 11,” but “other states say no, [we want to start at] 9. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:00 pm
Justice Scalia then elaborated on his skepticism over the government’s attempts to prevail on the statute alone, stating that “we’re not writing on a blank slate here. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:26 am
Stern (In re Marshall), 600 F.3d 1037 (9th Cir. 2010) (pdf). [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:15 am
Justice Stephen Breyer, from the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 12:30 am
In a dissent, Justice Stephen Breyer said the decision probably will result in a flood of false arrest suits because criminal defendants won't risk missing the deadline to file suit.
Growing Law Firms Relocate to Prime N.Y. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 1:04 am
The American Lawyer
Patent litigators are a must-have for firms, and they're willing to pay for them. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Judge Charles Breyer of the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:44 am
If you’re interested in learning more about the Roberts Court, check out “Uncertain Justice,” which explores the issues I’ve discussed here at greater length and tells some great stories along the way. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
”[21] Under this test, Ginger Rogers and the estate of Fred Astaire could not prevent a filmmaker from using the title “Ginger and Fred” in a fictional film because the use was “clearly related to the content of the movie and is not a disguised advertisement for the sale of goods or services or a collateral commercial product. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am
But did favor accused infringers sometimes: Fourth Estate v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm
Writing for the dissent, Justice Breyer referred to this as “a constitutionally required gam [read post]
