Search for: "In Re Estate of Freeman"
Results 21 - 40
of 77
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2017, 11:28 am
In honor of International Women's Day, a list of some films that feature female lawyers and judges.A la folie, pas du tout (2002). [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:14 pm
” Freeman v. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:36 pm
#ProblemSolver #Protector #EnrolledAgent (29) @kerryfreemanea – Kerry Freeman, EA – Tax Professional, Member of National Association of EAs, Arizona Society of EAs and current President of Phoenix West Chapter. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 8:50 am
But the higher courts rule it is possible when we’re talking about a person who, in the plaintiff capacity, is acting as personal representative of the estate of the decedent. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 8:50 am
But the higher courts rule it is possible when we’re talking about a person who, in the plaintiff capacity, is acting as personal representative of the estate of the decedent. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:27 am
Call Freeman Injury Law — 1-800-561-7777 for a free appointment to discuss your rights. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 5:56 am
Call Freeman Injury Law — 1-800-561-7777 for a free appointment to discuss your rights. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 5:56 am
Call Freeman Injury Law — 1-800-561-7777 for a free appointment to discuss your rights. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 6:01 am
He wanted to simply re-attach the trailer and be back on his way. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:11 am
A New York Estate Lawyer said this was a proceeding brought before the Surrogate's Court, Suffolk County, for the accounting of AFS, as administrator c.t.a. of the estate of WPS. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts (123 Misc 346 [Sur Ct, Columbia County 1924], affd 213 App Div 59 [4th Dept 1925], affd 241 NY 593 [1925]), and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman (34 NY2d 1 [1974]) (see Matter of Berkman, 93 Misc 2d 423 [Sur Ct, Bronx County 1978]). [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:13 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts (241 NY 593 [1925]), as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman (34 NY2d 1 [1974]). [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:23 pm
We're two out of three and we're on a hot streak considering that we've won two in a row. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 10:28 am
Justice Freeman asked whether there was any significance to the fact that In re Marriage of Kozloff was decided before the most recent amendments to Section 2-1001. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 10:04 am
Buchanan Ingersoll Counsel Ellen Freeman's experience corroborates this perspective. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 6:17 am
” – Donald Rumsfeld (Illustration by Owen Freeman) Complex estate litigation usually doesn’t get resolved in a single winner-take-all trial. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:04 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:04 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:06 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 7:05 pm
In discharging this duty to review fees, the court cannot apply a selected few factors which might be more favorable to one position or another but must strike a balance by considering all of the elements set forth in Matter of Potts, and as re-enunciated in Matter of Freeman. [read post]
