Search for: "In Re Federal Computer Corporation, Petitioner"
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
Schlumberger Technology Corporation v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:39 am
Those travelers who already have a valid ESTA do not have to re-register or pay the fee at this time. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:49 pm
See In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943 (Fed. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:28 am
In addition to the penalty, Tree Top will update its computer hardware and an install an advanced ammonia detection system that will make future releases less likely. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
“We’re hopeful that we’re going to keep seeing dramatic reductions. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Verizon voluntarily entered into a corporate audit agreement with the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 3:25 pm
It is sent as a WORD document for loading into your computer. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court: Canwest v… [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Hagerman, No. 08-2670 In a case involving criminal sanctions against a corporation for violations of the Clean Water Act, appeals from dismissal of the government's petition seeking relief from alleged probation violations are dismissed where: 1) an individual defendant was not a party to the probation-violation proceeding and no order against him was entered; and 2) the corporate defendant, an LLC, could not be represented pro se by one of its members, but, like a… [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:36 pm
LG Electronics, the Supreme Court is being asked whether the Federal Circuit erred by holding, in conflict with decisions of this Court and other courts of appeals, that respondent's patent rights were not exhausted by its license agreement with Intel Corporation, and Intel's subsequent sale of product under the license to petitioners. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 11:12 am
The question presented in this case is "[w]hether the Federal Circuit erred by holding, in conflict with decisions of this Court and other courts of appeals, that respondent's patent rights were not exhausted by its license agreement with Intel Corporation, and Intel's subsequent sale of products under the license to petitioners. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
In response, we reanalyze our data, separating the individuals from the corporations; in every case the re-analyzed data support the conclusions of our original paper to the same extent or more strongly. [read post]
