Search for: "In Re Frank"
Results 21 - 40
of 5,218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2010, 11:22 am
” I take it we're supposed to infer some sort of conflict of interest? [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 4:15 am
To take stock of where we’ve been & where we’re going, here’s a rundown of what’s being said about Dodd-Frank on its anniversary: – SEC Chair White – House Financial Services Committee – Q & A with Dodd-Frank (WSJ) – WSJ – Bloomberg – Market Watch – The Hill – Fortune – Money Also check out Davis Polk’s “5th Anniversary Dodd-Frank Progress Report” and cool… [read post]
4 Aug 2018, 1:01 am
The English radio says they’re being gassed. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has re-proposed a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has re-proposed a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has re-proposed a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has re-proposed a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has re-proposed a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act). [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
More than a decade after its initial proposal, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has re-proposed a new rule under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), prohibiting material conflicts of interest in asset-backed securities (ABS) transactions, as required by Section 621 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act). [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:20 am
After the 2016 re-proposal, we haven’t heard anything more from the regulators about implementing Section 956. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 8:19 pm
I’m sure they’re right, but the repeal effort will be attacked with or without the certainty provision, and on essentially the same ground. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 2:50 am
To heal, Frank the Crank Camacho will need to be patient and fight the urge to re-injure himself by returning to fighting too soon after his multi-vehicle collision. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 8:00 am
Franks and another v Bedward and another; [2010] EWHC 1650 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 181 “Where an application for registration of title to land was ordered to be cancelled by the adjudicator, and the applicant subsequently succeeded in an appeal in circumstances where the order for cancellation was not protected by a stay, the court could direct the re-entry on the day list of the registration application with its original entry date. [read post]
HELP ME BILL CLINTON, YOU’RE OUR ONLY HOPE: Barney Frank just blinked, and everyone in Massachusett…
23 Sep 2010, 5:38 am
HELP ME BILL CLINTON, YOU’RE OUR ONLY HOPE: Barney Frank just blinked, and everyone in Massachusetts knows it. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 8:54 am
The Dodd-Frank Act creates several entirely new disclosure regimes and re-allocates regulatory responsibility within many existing regimes. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:46 am
While we’re at it, why not privatize Dodd-Frank rule-writing as well? [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 3:38 am
Accordingly, Frank's two suits are identical for purposes of res judicata and therefore Count I is barred. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 4:52 am
I am therefore re-posting Dara Horn's excellent and important article on Holocaust erasure. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:06 am
He said, “We’re going to survive, and we’re going to be healthy”, and his willingness to put himself on the line, to protest, and to continue to argue on behalf of treaty rights and the salmon, was the work of his lifetime. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 9:05 pm
You might not know that Frank Pasquale recently won a victory in a court case in Texas, In re Does 1-10, -- S.W.3d --, 2007 WL 4328204 (Tex. [read post]
