Search for: "In Re Franke, Inc., Appellant"
Results 21 - 40
of 132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
Best Buy Company, Inc. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 6:41 am
Last month Nokia had already obtained an against Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 12:53 pm
Kevin York - "Appellants-defendants Heritage Lake Property Owners Association, Inc., et al. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 12:26 pm
See Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:27 am
In its July 9, 2012 opinion, written by Chief Judge Frank H. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 9:19 am
The district court rejected Franks, necessity, and minimization challenges; appellants were convicted after plea or trial.Issue(s): "Defendants argue that the government failed to show necessity for a wiretap on two telephones and failed to properly minimize the various wiretaps it used in its investigation of the conspiracy. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 12:52 am
In July 2008, a state Appellate Court upheld that finding. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 5:38 pm
We liked two “lessons” articulated by Frank Steinberg of the NJLB, so we quote: 1. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 12:26 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKTorts Reconsideration of Dismissal of Negligence Claims Against Bank Denied; Res Ipsa Loquitor Inapplicable Jones v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 1:35 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITLegal ProfessionFree With Registration: Debevoise & Plimpton Is Reinstated as MetLife's Counsel in Case In re MetLife Demutualization Litigation
APPELLATE DIVISIONFIRST DEPARTMENTContracts$474,298 Judgment Enforcing Merger Pact's Terms Upheld; Only Unilateral, Not Mutual, Mistake Shown Resort Sports Network Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 7:11 pm
The full Delaware Supreme Court recently revived part of an investor challenge to IAC/InterActive Corp’s spinoff of its internet dating subsidiary after finding that the deal that controller IAC imposed on minority shareholders did not meet the exacting standards of the high court’s seminal MFW ruling, in In re Match Group Inc. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:33 am
Tomco Machining, Inc. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 7:46 am
In re: R.K. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 8:38 am
ATOFINA Petrochemicals, Inc., No. 03-0647. [read post]
7 May 2007, 1:15 am
Think your firm isn't re-examining its compensation system? [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:59 am
A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:00 am
The appeal considered to what extent, if at all, factual findings made by the General Court of the European Union in the course of its judgment in Case T-691/14 Servier SAS v EU Commission annulling a competition infringement decision of the European Commission are binding as res judicata on English courts. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:02 am
This appeal will consider the extent, it at all, that factual findings made by the General Court of the European Union in the course of its judgment in Case T-691/14 Servier SAS v EU Commission annulling a competition infringement decision of the European Commission are binding as res judicata on English courts in a follow-on private damages action brought by the Respondents against the Appellants. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 11:08 am
" In DAP, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
The panel in Franks v. [read post]
