Search for: "In Re Frederick"
Results 21 - 40
of 754
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2023, 5:56 am
Only kidding.Anyway, if you liked Jayapal's bungling on the county board, you're gonna love six months to a year of Beason. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 11:09 pm
Otherwise, the cities, the counties, Metro, Tri-Met, the Port, and the rest will bleed us dry only to pour the blood down the usual rat holes.And at both state and local levels, we need a taxpayers' bill of rights, so that when the revenuers show up at your door, they're not allowed to be absolute cutthroats, the way the City of Portland tax collectors tend to be.Tell this to Kate Lieber (when she gets back from Portugal), Lew Frederick, and the other innocuous-looking… [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 10:24 am
Meanwhile in 2010, Great Concepts’ former attorney Frederick Taylor filed a combined declaration with the USPTO seeking to maintain the registration under Section 8 and also to obtain incontestable status under Section 15. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
This repository contains a collection of information for researchers, journalists, educators, scholars, and the public at large. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 1:32 am
However, within this guidance, permission was granted to install gas-fired heating in two more churches: see Re Christ Church Gipsy Hill [2023] ECC Swk 8 and Re St Anselm Kennington Cross [2023] ECC Swk6. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 7:49 am
Thanks, Lew Frederick! [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Leibowitz Professor of Trial Techniques and Director of the Cornell Death Penalty Project, Cornell Law SchoolModerator: John Leubsdorf, Distinguished Professor of Law and Judge Frederick B. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 9:03 pm
A follow-up visit the next day found the premises had been cleaned and re-organized with repairs to electrical sockets and reinstatement of the hot water system, so it was allowed to re-open. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:17 pm
August 25, 2023 By Grace Mappes, Riley Bailey, Angelica Evans, Christina Harward, and Frederick W. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
First, for example, as detailed in the release, the final rule was revised from the proposal to allow for more flexibility to offer preferential treatment through side letters so long as they’re disclosed and in some cases the preferential treatment is offered to all investors. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
First, for example, as detailed in the release, the final rule was revised from the proposal to allow for more flexibility to offer preferential treatment through side letters so long as they’re disclosed and in some cases the preferential treatment is offered to all investors. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
First, for example, as detailed in the release, the final rule was revised from the proposal to allow for more flexibility to offer preferential treatment through side letters so long as they’re disclosed and in some cases the preferential treatment is offered to all investors. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
Frederick Douglass Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
Frederick Douglass Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 2:48 am
Sure, give Lew Frederick and Tawna Sanchez a call. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
Originally, through the court’s decision in In re Caremark Int’l Inc. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:12 pm
Yoo hoo, Lew Frederick! [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:47 pm
People like Lew Frederick and Tawna Sanchez have nothing to be proud of. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:29 am
Another sheriff, Chuck Jenkins (no relation) of Frederick County, Maryland, was also recently indicted for an alleged scheme that involved machine gun trafficking in exchange for political support in his re-election campaign. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
LP (1st Dept 2011), Stone v Frederick (3d Dept 1997), and Giaimo v EGA Associates (1st Dept 2009), cement the concept that, where the by-laws do not overtly give the president the right to commence litigation, and there is board or shareholder deadlock about the propriety of doing so, the president then lacks the authority to bring an action directly in the name of the corporation. [read post]
