Search for: "In Re George G."
Results 21 - 40
of 608
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
In re Abbott, 954 f.3d 772 (5th Cir. 2020), vacated, 141 S. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Mary Anne Franks, now a professor of law at The George Washington University, explores “Social Media and the Weaponization of Free Speech. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 7:41 pm
Millions of Cats by Wanda Gág. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm
Is there a topic you're itching to write about? [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Oh Mickey, you’re so fine—but you’re not alone: An avalanche of copyrighted works will enter the public domain in the United States on January 1, 2024. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
By Thomas A. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:08 pm
Steven G. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 2:41 pm
Shapo, George G. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 1:17 pm
L'autonomie des parties règne en la matière. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm
[With thanks to Dr Georg Neureither.] [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
Jacobson, 6 F.3d 233, 238 (4th Cir. 1993); In re Sealed Case, 931 F.3d 92, 97 (D.C. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:28 am
" From "Harry G. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 8:29 pm
If misery loves company, Bad Bunny is certainly in good company, with genre superstars Luis Fonsi, Daddy Yankee, Karol G, Maluma, Pitbull, and Ozuna also part of the case. [read post]
25 May 2023, 5:45 am
— but Warren G. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am
Supreme Court.[6] One influential re-articulation came in Wisconsin v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:10 pm
For example, the murder of George Floyd is likely to be condoned by almost no one and taking measures to avoid such atrocities would be supported by almost everyone. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The consensus falls apart over the merits of Selikoff’s actual research, his credentials, and his advocacy tactics.[1] Selikoff’s collaborators, protégés, and fellow travelers tend to brand any challenge or criticism as “scurrilous. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
[Guidance for judicial examination of legal history.] [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
One such example is the third edition’s treatment of confidence intervals.[1] The “DNA Identification” chapter noted that the meaning of a confidence interval is subtle,[2] but I doubt that the authors, David Kaye and George Sensabaugh, actually found it subtle or difficult. [read post]
