Search for: "In Re Gorsuch" Results 21 - 40 of 1,067
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2024, 10:15 am by Ronald Mann
For example,  Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson commented that she was “trying to figure out whether the proceeds of the life insurance are really going out when they’re being used to redeem the shares. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm by Guest Author
If you can’t set aside the rule and you’re not a regulated party, how is their injury redressable in this suit and why do they have standing? [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Amy Howe
And I think what Justice Gorsuch is saying,” Kagan continued, “is that that has got to be wrong. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:06 am
"Asked Neil Gorsuch, at oral argument yesterday, quoted in "Supreme Court debates whether Texas councilwoman who says her arrest was politically motivated can sue the mayor" (CNN).The case is Gonzalez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:33 am by SHG
As we’re regularly reminded these days, no one is above the law, including a councilwoman targeted by a unpleasant mayor. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am by Ronald Mann
… [W]hat you’re suggesting to us is that they don’t have a right to say the plan is violating a bunch of other provisions of the Code … I’ve just never heard of parsing standing in that way. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 6:24 am by Amy Howe
One plaintiff, they note, was “censored” after she re-published a post by Robert F. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:55 am by Trane Robinson
  Beckles had its own oddities: for one, it arose during the interregnum between Justices Scalia and Gorsuch. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 2:29 pm by Stewart Baker
Many of the remainder (Kagan, Sotomayor, Jackson) see social media content moderation as understandable, consistent with their own biases, and justified, but they're uneasy about the power of large platforms and reluctant to grant a sweeping immunity from regulation to those companies. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am by Derek T. Muller
So six justices, Chief Justice Roberts, Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett all agreed with heart of the reasoning in the per curiam opinion. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am by Derek T. Muller
So six justices, Chief Justice Roberts, Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett all agreed with heart of the reasoning in the per curiam opinion. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm by Josh Blackman
Were Trump re-elected, and contrary to Professor Lederman's hopes and aspirations, the question of whether the President is an "Officer of the United States" will not be "re-consigned to the obscure corners of implausible scholarship. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
., being 27 years old or being born outside the United States), as then-Judge Gorsuch held in the 2012 Tenth Circuit decision in Hassan v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 8:46 am by Josh Blackman
You're suggesting there may be a barrier under the Constitution to a state legislating an enforcement mechanism for Section 3 specific to federal officers. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:32 pm by Ronald Mann
Justice Neil Gorsuch, for example, led David Harris, representing the customers, to concede that “the arbitration agreement … is still operative,” and that “it says it applies to everything. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:41 pm by Ronald Mann
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Neil Gorsuch spent a great deal of time exploring that topic during Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart’s argument for the government. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 11:29 am by Dennis Crouch
Justice Gorsuch echoed this, stating “we’re being asked to decide the scope of something that may or may not exist. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Neil Gorsuch echoed Kavanaugh’s concerns. [read post]