Search for: "In Re Grand Jury No. 94-1" Results 21 - 33 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2015, 9:48 am by Andrew Frisch
Because at-issue waiver is to be “decided by the courts on a case-by-case basis, and depends primarily on the specific context in which the privilege is asserted,” In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 219 F.3d at 183, the Court will examine the specific factual context of this case. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Chap. 1, p. 52; 1844 Miss. chapter 1, p. 58. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 9:31 am by Elie Maalouf
Discussion In New Hampshire, the attorney-client privilege is set forth in Rule 502 of the New Hampshire Rules of Evidence, which provides: A client has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent any other person from disclosing confidential communications made for the purpose of facilitating the rendition of professional legal services to the client (1) between the client or his or her representative and the client’s lawyer or the lawyer’s representative…1… [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 5:46 am by Norman L. Eisen
Circuit has already decided the legal matter in the 2019 opinion, In re Grand Jury Investigation; and as a disclaimer, one of the authors (Seligman) argued the motion before Judge Cannon as an amicus.) [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
Subjective and Objective Standards for Determining the Parties’ Intentions Depending on the jurisdiction, courts use either an objective or subjective standard to determine the parties’ intentions.[30] In jurisdictions that use a subjective standard, the parties’ intentions are considered a question of fact, not a question of law, and courts thus defer the question to the jury to determine.[31] In jurisdictions that use an objective standard, courts look at “what a… [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:37 pm by admin
., Gazette-Mail, February 1, 2010 A federal judge has temporarily ordered a halt to mountaintop-removal protests that involve trespassing on Massey Energy property or interfering with any of Massey’s operations. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 2:25 pm by admin
., Gazette-Mail, February 1, 2010 A federal judge has temporarily ordered a halt to mountaintop-removal protests that involve trespassing on Massey Energy property or interfering with any of Massey’s operations. [read post]