Search for: "In Re Grynberg"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2017, 10:05 am
Digging a bit deeper in time, we have In re Right-On Co. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 8:17 am
Straight from Jeremy Sheff:On behalf of myself and my co-authors (Steve Clowney, James Grimmelmann, Mike Grynberg, and Rebecca Tushnet), I am pleased to announce the immediate availability of Open-Source Property, a completely free casebook for the 1L Property Law course. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 7:41 am
In In re Tam, the Federal Circuit... [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 7:35 am
Doctrinal error: they’re more guidelines to be balanced than elements to be satisfied. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm
Grynberg: Fewer cases involve that tension. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 9:40 am
Grynberg: functionality has virtue of being somewhat isolated from other doctrines, especially doctrines developed for word marks. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:38 am
Mark Lemley: Intermediate approaches in general may not be a bad idea, but worries that we’re not very good with “you’re in the door, but only a little bit, so you get very narrow rights. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Session 3: The Consumer in Different Trade Mark ContextsDo the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Grynberg: courts of appeals are much more comfortable with district courts making those kinds of calls than w/agencies. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
ECJ tends to say that when you’re assessing whether something is devoid of distinctive character/unregistrable, you use the POV of the consumer, and descriptive things ar [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:31 pm
Grynberg v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
If internet has shrunk geographic and product spaces, doesn’t necessarily mean consumer perception of the meaning of distance stays unchanged.Mike Grynberg: there are a lot of doctrines that have similar effects in geog. and product markets—one could look at the Rogers test as a kind of “honest concurrent use” for geography. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am
They’re thinking them through in context of defining the territorial dimension of rights. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm
Michael Grynberg, DePaul University College of LawThick Marks Thin MarksMark might be strong but receive weak protection based on nature of claim, such as nominative fair use. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:14 am
Grynberg: Fed. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
Though we may call §43(a) claims unfair competition, because they’re subject to all the same rules as registered TMs, we don’t really think about the differences. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 7:07 am
Michael Grynberg’s general thesis about TM law: TM law ignores nonconfused consumers, the other 95%, and we should focus on their goals. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am
Grynberg: Litman says courts don’t necessarily care about working doctrine pure; Grynberg thinks that they can be attracted to doing so in appropriate circumstances. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:50 pm
If we’re going to engage with boundaries, we should also engage with the instincts courts have about copying. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
In Europe, for example, they’re considering revising their version of functionality, and it’s bubbling in the US too. [read post]
