Search for: "In Re Interest of LJ"
Results 21 - 40
of 295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
The judgment addresses some interesting procedural questions regarding appeals. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 6:54 pm
” (Mine is quite a bit more accessible than this new book, so if you’re interested in the field, you might want to start there.) [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 10:24 am
This was, said Kitchin LJ, an attempt to reargue the case on the facts. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 12:10 am
Nobody representing the interests and concerns of victims was invited. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 9:44 am
Seddon [1999] 1 WLR 1482, 1490 [CA, per Auld LJ])However, nothing turns on the description of the rule as either an ‘extended application of the res judicata doctrine’ (C (A Minor) v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 1:21 am
[para 198] According to Briggs LJ, the reason is a domestic one. [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:38 am
Jacob LJ dissents. [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:38 am
Jacob LJ dissents. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am
R (on the application of LG) (Appellant) v Independent Appeal Panel for Tom Hood School (Respondent) & Secretary of State for the Department for Children, Schools and Families (Interested Party) [2010] EWCA Civ 142 (Read judgment here) CA (Civ Div) (Rix LJ, Wilson LJ, Sir Scott Baker) February 26 2010 An exclusion hearing by a school does not engage the pupil’s Article 6 of the Convention since there is no “civil right” to education recognized as… [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
He preferred the approach of Richards LJ in R (C) who had also thought Wood was over-rigid and had been overtaken by Strasbourg database cases (such as Marper v UK) in which REP was not used as a litmus. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:26 am
One cannot really say whether there is any public interest in the nature of freedom of competition seriously involved. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 10:33 am
As some of you saw on Co-Op the other day, there's an unusual exchange going on in the pages of the Georgetown LJ this month. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
” Ms Kireeva’s counsel pointed to the case of Re Kooperman [(1928) 13 B&CR 49] (“Re Kooperman”) as an example of the court granting such relief. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 3:36 am
(You can opt out of spiders on LJ too, of course - but the option is distinctly not that obvious.) [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Having failed to overcome the plausibility hurdle, the patentee was not entitled to rely on post-published evidence to show sufficiency.Claire raised some interesting points to consider at the end of her talk:In light of Kitchen LJ’s treatment of paragraphs [0003] and [0006], what is/is not to be recognised as a definition in a Patent? [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
On that footing, it would in my opinion have been essential to stay the English proceedings so that the decision of the EPO would not be rendered nugatory by the operation of the law of res judicata. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:09 am
You’re my only hope! [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm
Taswell (1858) 27 LJ (Ch) 812; In re King's Leasehold Estates (1873) LR 16 Eq 521; Zimbler v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:16 pm
Taswell (1858) 27 LJ (Ch) 812; In re King's Leasehold Estates (1873) LR 16 Eq 521; Zimbler v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:05 am
Lord Neuberger MR and Arden LJ disagreed. [read post]
