Search for: "In Re Jamie G." Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm by Series of Essays
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight the top fifty pieces of 2017 authored by The Regulatory Review staff contributors. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
  On Thursday 5 October 2017 we reported on statements in open court in the cases of Steve Coogan, Sienna Miller and Jamie Theakston. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:35 am
" In today's edition of The Los Angeles Times, David G. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 12:00 am
Isn’t it time you learned to ride the waves you’re hearing? [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:00 pm
Isn’t it time you learned to ride the waves you’re hearing? [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 2:34 pm by Editor Charlie
” (emphasis mine) The rumor is that the apology was engineered by Amazon board member Jamie Gorelick, the former Clinton Deputy Attorney General who preceded Eric Holder (later Obama’s Attorney General who was in office when the apology was tendered). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:24 pm by David Lat & Elie Mystal
Oh, then take what you’re given, pipe down, and bring me some coffee. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:35 am by Mandelman
The very creation of the new consumer protection agency… according to Johhny G. we didn’t even need one in the first place. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 10:26 am by Kelly
Even the lobbyists can’t quite articulate what they’re opposing. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm by smtaber
— Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, November 30, 2009 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘CAA’’ or the ‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed consent decree to address a lawsuit filed by Comite Civico Del Valle, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California: Comite Civico Del Valle, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 8:57 am
We'll be ready to prosecute just as soon as they're ready. [read post]