Search for: "In Re Loring"
Results 21 - 40
of 303
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2007, 2:48 am
The IDS is available on the internet.In a June 30 post on wired, Steven Edwards discusses WARF's recent action, pointing out the conflicts that Loring has. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 8:11 am
As regular readers will know, Family Lore likes to promote marital harmony. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 1:47 pm
So, if you’re looking to employ an experienced family law hack, then I could be your man. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:11 am
Zloch Order 12-30-09 Re Spolter Sanctions Hi folks, I hope you all had a tremendous New Year. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 4:44 pm
Nice review of 'BabyBarista and the Art of War' from top blogger John Bolch of the Family Lore blog here and also below. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 11:37 pm
In an exclusive interview with Family Lore, Edgar Venal, Senior Partner at Messrs. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
I think perhaps somebody should send them a copy of Re B [2008] UKHL 35. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 8:50 am
Long-term readers of Family Lore will no doubt remember the 'YouTube divorce' and the delightful Ms. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 12:23 am
One recalls that the ill-fated re-examination effort of PubPat and FTCR (now re-named "Consumer Watchdog") on the WARF patents fell apart on the conclusory nature of statements by Loring and Trounson. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 5:09 am
Or is that a silly concern when we're talking about the San Francisco Bay area? [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 4:01 am
LBE is not sure of the identity of any patent attorney who thinks that the PubPat/FTCR challenge will prevail, in view of the response made by WARF to the re-examination. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 1:57 am
Earlier a declaration by Loring was filed by the challangers, and was dutifully and explicitly ignored by the USPTO as procedurally improper. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
Loree Jr. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 4:01 pm
Pour a load of water on the top, and you're done. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Loree Jr. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
The case Re L (A Child: Media Reporting) [2011] EWHC B8 (Fam) has just been reported on Bailii. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 7:46 am
More to the point of the re-examination of the Thomson patents, Somers neglected to mention that Thomson DID DISCUSS the work of Bongso in Thomson's '780 patent, even though Loring did NOT discuss the work of Bongso in her '765 application. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 11:40 pm
The declarations of Trounson, Loring, and Melton (which have relevance ONLY to the inter partes proceeding as to US 7,209,913) had no impact on the USPTO decision. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 2:02 pm
Awards from good friend and fellow blogger, John Bolch of Family Lore, I accept with pleasure. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:09 pm
" Paragraph 12 of the Stewart declaration flat out contradicts the Loring declaration (which, in any event, was not considered by the USPTO in the re-exam): "methods used to isolate mouse ES cells ... are not universally applicable" Paragraph 16 of the Stewart declaration deals with LIF. [read post]
