Search for: "In Re MCA, Inc."
Results 21 - 31
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2012, 12:46 am
ince hakk? [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am
Since the MCA doesn’t say anything about private causes of actions for U.S. citizens, it can’t be relied on to provide such a positive grant. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 9:51 am
September 26, 2024 | By: Daniel Davis & Alex Butterman In Jack Daniel’s v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 7:46 pm
Dees, supra, at 437; MCA, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:27 am
MCA Records, Inc., 296 F.3d 896 (9th Cir. 2002), the judge turned to the “raft of unfocused issues raised by the parties. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
Capital Cities/ABC, Inc., 255 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2001). [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
by Marty Lederman By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in long-term military… [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
This post is by my colleagues Gail Lees, Andrew Tulumello, Chip Nierlich, Mark Whitburn and Chris Chorba. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* [Cross-posted at OpinioJuris] Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in… [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am
Texaco Inc.? [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees, you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]