Search for: "In Re Marriage of Null"
Results 21 - 39
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2010, 6:25 pm
Woods brought an action against Sad Bank seeking a declaratory judgment to have the mortgage against them declared null and void. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 5:45 am
See the following footnote in this post: In re Estate of Gardiner, 273 Kan. 191 (2002) (Wife received no share of estate upon death of husband as court said she was a man in the eyes of the law, despite sexual reassignment surgery, birth certificate noting her as female [issued in Wisconsin], and having satisfied all other prerequisites to marriage). [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:10 am
“It only takes one tiny oversight in a DIY estate plan to cause the entire thing to backfire, or even become null and void in Georgia. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:22 pm
Even though I’ve mentioned my own reservations about gay marriage, there’s simply nothing conservative at all about this Amendment One business and the government effectively decreeing to churches what will and will not constitute a valid marriage between consenting adults. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:04 pm
We affirm.NFP civil opinions today (2): In Re: The Marriage of William D. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 8:26 am
’ (In re Marriage of Arceneaux (1990) 51 Cal.3d 1130, 1133].) [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:34 pm
Smith has two (2) children from his first marriage. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:59 am
In view of current court practice there is no need for a German statute, which in situations in which both spouses have their habitual residence in Germany, provides for court action in order to declare the second marriage null and void. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
Jurisdiction. - (1) Subject to the other provisions of this Act, a Family Court shall-Explanation -The suits and proceedings referred to in this subsection are suits and proceedings of the following nature, namely:a suit or proceeding between the parties to a marriage for decree of a nullity marriage (declaring the marriage to be null and void or, as the case may be, annulling the marriage) or restitution of conjugal rights or judicial separation or… [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 11:58 am
Bigamy: A criminal offense committed when one spouse enters a marriage when the previous marriage has not been terminated. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
In Re X, the Supreme Court refused to narrow its application, describing the doctrine as “the widest nature. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 7:11 am
Before we get to the legal issues, I need to outline the facts that led to the opinion we’re concerned with. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Lauderdale Division.Bankruptcy -- Confirmation -- Chapter 13 plan -- Good faith -- Chapter 13 debtors failed to carry their burden to establish confirmation of good faith plan where debtors purchased and financed vehicles shortly before their bankruptcy filings in contemplation of those filings, and then proposed chapter 13 plan which would repay the 910-day car claim at less than contractual interest rates such that plans were not proposed in good faith -- Confirmation denied without prejudice to… [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
It provided an in-depth discussion of California’s leading case on military pension shifting, In re Marriage of Krempin (1999) 70 CA4th 1008, and its dissection of the majority rule (22 states, including California, allowing for some equitable remedy to the non-military spouse in the form of support reassessment or redistribution of martial property) and minority rule (5 states allowing for no remedy) nationwide. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
Further, the husband’s testimony, as well as his bank records, showed that he made no contributions to his self-directed IRA during the marriage. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 8:59 pm
from prior marriage, 2 more children with ? [read post]
21 May 2019, 2:07 pm
He is critical of recent decisions that do not give primacy to religious views: “the physician’s conscience becomes an issue of patient services; the religious university’s support of traditional marriage interferes with equality [Law Society of British Columbia v. [read post]
28 May 2023, 9:23 pm
Therefore, X et al. should be prevented from bringing a new action, the purpose of which was the re-examination of what had already been decided (DSC, Appeal No. 419/2023 of 17 May 2023). [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 2:05 pm
It might be useful, now, to re-consider those facts, the acts, the relations, to which the great principles of the Declaration of Independence were meant to give meaning and suggest action. [read post]
