The first is essentially what the originalists have been saying in response to that school, namely that there's too much play in the joints, too many different ways to read these underlying normative principles—we're back to the age-old back-and-forth of "your constitutional theory generates indeterminate results and can't constrain judges' politics! [read post]

Interviewer: [Y]ou’re saying there’s statutes on the books now[?] [read post]