Search for: "In Re Medical Review Panel"
Results 21 - 40
of 888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
Pandemic legislation changes FDA staffing and procedures so that they’re more in line with the rules surrounding prescription drugs, and this caused the FDA to produce an 89-page review. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
Purchase was the first Pennsylvania lawyer to argue before an en banc Superior Court panel in Philadelphia on November 18, 2010 in In Re: Estate of Daniel L. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 1:38 pm
., concurs, Justice Dickson writes for the majority:The Indiana Medical Malpractice Act generally requires that actions for medical negligence against health care providers must first be submitted to and considered by a medical re-view panel. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
The court noted that even "[a]ssuming arguendo that the records constitute expert reports, none of the records state, within a reasonable degree of medical certainty" that the Plaintiff's injuries were the result of the medical malpractice alleged.While the court noted that the Plaintiff need not utilize "magic words," the use of terms of causation such as "most likely" or "in all likelihood" were not sufficient.As stated the… [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 8:50 am
After these criteria are met, the plaintiff’s and defendant’s teams then work together to form a medical review panel that reviews the case and expresses its view on the case before it proceeds to settlement or court. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
The employer’s medical utilization review provider determined that the medical necessity of the procedure was not documented, and the employer denied approval for the procedure. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 3:54 am
A recent California Workers' Compensation Appeals Board panel decision may cause a bit of tumult in the already contentious forum of Independent Medical Review.In an order granting reconsideration by applicant Diane Garibay-Jimenez, Commissioners Rick Dietrich, Deidra Lowe and Cristine Gondak found that not only is it the employer/administrator's sole responsibility to make sure that IMR is provided with all relevant medical records (in a timely fashion) but that… [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 8:22 am
”The three-justice panel begins with a review of the last opinion’s findings. [read post]
17 May 2017, 7:44 am
Preventive Services Task Force, which does periodic, evidence-based reviews of common medical screens. [read post]
17 May 2017, 7:44 am
Preventive Services Task Force, which does periodic, evidence-based reviews of common medical screens. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Defendant petitioned to compel evaluation of the applicant's two subsequent claims using the original panel QME but did not ask for a re‑evaluation of the prior cumulative injury. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm
Filed under: Art. 6 | Right to Fair Trial, Case comments, Employment, Medical [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:26 pm
When the defendant appealed his case to the Arizona Court of Appeals, a three-judge panel overturned the conviction. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
If you’re looking for a model of how to deprive people of their rights after they’ve suffered from medical malpractice, go to Wisconsin. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 8:30 pm
WCC Official Hospital and Ambulatory Surgical Center Fee Schedule Memorandum - December 31, 2014 MEMORANDUM NO. 2014-06 TO: WCC Commissioners, Facility Fee Schedule Core Committee Members, District Administrators, Advisory Board, Legal Advisory Panel, Medical Advisory Panel, Medical Practitioners, Self-Insureds, Insurance Carriers, Medical Care Plans, Attorneys, and Unions. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 5:22 am
” In re Westinghouse Sec. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 10:25 am
Reviewing de novo the validity of the settlement agreement, the panel majority reaffirmed the broad reading of Section 16600 reached in Golden I. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 9:03 am
Therefore, the appellate panel ruled the second count should have been filed as a medical malpractice case. [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:44 am
" I put guidelines in quotes because though they are called that, in practice they are dictatorial instructions - utilization review, and now independent medical review, follow the "guidelines" in an almost rote fashion with little to no exception.This removes physician medical discretion, and adjuster discretion. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 5:33 am
“That’s what we’re going to do with the IMR here, as well. [read post]
