Search for: "In Re Pacer Technology"
Results 21 - 40
of 128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2012, 2:12 am
By Dennis Crouch The PACER entry is compelling: JURY VERDICT For: Plaintiffs Against: Defendants In the Amount of: One Billion Dollars. [read post]
29 May 2008, 6:22 am
We’re not sure, but PACER account representative Shawn Robledo, also was unaware of the problem until she was guided through the process of downloading, copying and pasting. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 6:00 am
Free PACER saves money. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 2:00 pm
The prototype system (federal CM/ECF) was built on technology of that era. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 5:32 am
The new commercial module is an important achievement in leveraging technologies such as machine learning and natural language processing to identify, code and expose important new subsets of litigation which have been buried in the arcane coding of federal Pacer system. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 8:16 am
., No. 03-cv-01267--in which the court (Judge Carney, in this case) reconsidered a defendant's summary judgment motion in view of In Re Seagate Technology, LLC, 83 USPQ2d 1 (Fed. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 10:47 am
The whole is greater than the sum of its parts, and we’re just getting started,” he added. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:40 am
Fees get plowed back to the courts to finance technology, but the system runs a budget surplus of some $150 million, according to recent court reports. [read post]
1 May 2019, 10:16 am
Even the best AI technology cannot prevent that. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 10:13 am
Can't find what you're looking for on Regulation.gov? [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
Excuse #4: “Congress said that we’re allowed to spend PACER funds on other things” This is false. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:34 pm
Of course the Federal Court system has had electronic filing for years through its Pacer system. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 2:40 pm
Why do I have a feeling we’re not getting the whole story here? [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:33 am
Digitization and the Internet changed that, but even today most federal court documents live behind a government paywall known as PACER. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 1:23 pm
The whole is greater than the sum of its parts, and we’re just getting started,” he added. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:54 am
The defendant went through in its brief (Document 46 on PACER) and listed the major ways in which the technological characteristics of the device in question differed from the two predicate devices as to which plaintiff sought discovery. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:00 am
We have a PACER account, and we’re not afraid to use it, so we looked up the docket for that case. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 5:45 am
“We’re using analytics and data visualization to make new insights possible,” said Docket Alarm Founder and Managing Director Michael Sander. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 9:45 am
There are also a couple of extra features that we're eager to get feedback on. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 10:56 pm
We all want it to be free, but Greg puts on his Devil’s Advocate hat (complete with horns) and takes a view from the unpopular side of what does FREE PACER mean for the courts and its technology? [read post]
