Search for: "In Re S.C.J"
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 8:13 am
Consequently, any apparent findings of fact made by the summary-judgment motion judge do not support a res judicata or issue estoppel claim in [...] [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 6:07 am
During the broadcast the prosecutor stated: I have told some of these individuals, “Look, you can come down and you can put this behind you by serving your time in prison and making restitution to the victims, or you can wind up serving a great deal longer sentence under much more stringent conditions" […] When asked to describe these conditions, the prosecutor… [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:11 pm
., [1994] S.C.J. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:11 pm
., [1994] S.C.J. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 11:30 am
., [1994] S.C.J. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 11:30 am
., [1994] S.C.J. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 11:54 am
Judgment Released: April 27, 2010 Link to Judgment The applicant had obtained judgment for the return of a $250,000 deposit from the respondent and now sought $103,023 in costs. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:11 pm
Judgment Released: February 26, 2010 Link to Judgment This was a motion in a CCAA matter seeking the return of a deposit in an agreement to purchase property. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 12:43 pm
Judgment released: April 15, 2010 Link to Judgment Where a motion for summary judgment was prepared and argued before January 1, 2010, and reasons were released after that date only because of constraints on the Court’s calendar, the motion was decided under the old Rule 20. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 11:25 am
Judgment Released: April 17, 2010 Link to Judgment In advocating a “common sense” method for correcting clerical errors in the date of death in a Certificate of Appointment, the Court held that the principle of common sense is expressly articulated in the new Rule 1.04(1.1) by providing that a court “shall make orders and give directions that are proportionate [...] [read post]
9 May 2010, 11:54 am
No. 3419 (S.C.J.) at para.14, leave to appeal to Div. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:06 am
S.C.J.) [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:04 am
S.C.J.) [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 7:43 pm
S.C.J.) [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 11:03 pm
The recent decision of Brown J. in Re Willis Estate, 2009 CanLII 30681 (Ont. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
.), at p. 415, applied in Re F (in utero), supra. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:35 pm
No. 692 (S.C.J.), the plaintiff alleged that a brain injury caused him ongoing fatigue which prevented him from being able to maintain employment. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:06 pm
This information was enough to satisfy the Master that Facebook would be effective in bringing knowledge of the legal proceedings to the attention of the defendants.2 Facebook, for its part, was quite happy with the result, stating: “We’re pleased to see the Australian court validate Facebook as a reliable, secure and private medium for communication. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 6:31 pm
S.C.J.). [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 5:15 am
S.C.J.). [read post]
