Search for: "In Re Supreme Court License Fees"
Results 21 - 40
of 883
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2015, 1:12 am
Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 12:57 pm
The Oklahoma Supreme Court has blocked the Impaired Driving Elimination Act. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
The Supreme Court's Kirby page is here. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 10:25 am
As David Kravets at Wired’s Threat Level notes, “The lead plaintiff in the case, Lawrence Golan, told the high court that it will not longer be able to perform Prokofiev’s Classical Symphony and Peter and the Wolf, or Shostakovich’s Symphony 14, Cello Concerto because of licensing fees. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
In other words; no license, no fee. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:18 am
According to the opinion, the company is the equivalent of a cable company, which must pay licensing fees when broadcasting over-the-air content. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:35 pm
One: It's the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:11 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit of the district court's decision in In re N.C.P. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 12:03 pm
In Philadelphia Entertainment, the Debtor obtained a slot machine license from the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board in exchange for a $50 million fee, but later lost the license to revocation when it failed to satisfy certain conditions. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 12:03 pm
In Philadelphia Entertainment, the Debtor obtained a slot machine license from the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board in exchange for a $50 million fee, but later lost the license to revocation when it failed to satisfy certain conditions. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 12:03 pm
In Philadelphia Entertainment, the Debtor obtained a slot machine license from the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board in exchange for a $50 million fee, but later lost the license to revocation when it failed to satisfy certain conditions. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 3:27 pm
Lentz, 547 NE 2d 191 – Ill: Supreme Court 1989 The Illinois Supreme Court explained that there are three reasons why Illinois courts will not award attorney’s fees to pro se litigants. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 1:22 pm
Photo by Eric Quitugua Texas Supreme Court Chief Justice Nathan L. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 2:31 pm
Noteworthy 2011 Corporate and Commercial Decisions from Delaware’s Supreme Court and Court of Chancery. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
The United States then appealed the decision, and matter was brought before the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:23 pm
The decision reaffirms that the equitable framework laid out by the Supreme Court in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 10:09 pm
The Committee did adopt a recommendation that “The supreme court should adopt statewide fee guidelines for attorneys and fiduciaries paid from an estate. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 6:12 pm
by Dennis Crouch The Supreme Court has not yet granted writ of certiorari in any patent cases this term. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 7:53 am
There is no fee unless you win. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 2:44 pm
Last week, the Supreme Court refused for a second time to block SB8, effectively dismissing suits filed against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a couple of state court officials and a private party and retaining suits only against various state licensing officials. [read post]
