Search for: "In Re Underhill"
Results 21 - 40
of 109
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2012, 5:45 am
We heard from Rod Underhill and the library -- that was it. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:04 pm
If the detonation they’re worried about is a government test, I’m not sure a state measure could stop the federal government from testing if it could show it really needed to do so in Colorado. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:05 pm
This time we're thrilled to co-host the event with the Berkeley Center for Law & Technology at the UC Berkeley Law School. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 2:41 pm
You can’t be a polygamist, of course — at least for now — but you’re not supposed to even tell anyone about it. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:46 am
The Secretary of State published guidance in 2016, re-issued in April 2018, entitled “Civil Penalties under the Housing and Planning Act 2016 – Guidance for Local Housing Authorities” (the Guidance). [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
Res. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 5:33 pm
You’re welcome. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:08 pm
Further thoughts from Kevin Underhill on being sued by Orly Taitz [Lowering the Bar, earlier] U.S. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:19 am
If you're planning to join us Wednesday evening at The Owl Tree in San Francisco, we'll be there at 7:30 pm and hangin' out late. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 12:01 am
While you're at it, make sure you have at least one good book-weight as well. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:19 am
If you're planning to join us Wednesday evening at The Owl Tree in San Francisco, we'll be there at 7:30 pm and hangin' out late. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:18 am
Here’s the facts: pretty much everyone loves to shop for different reasons; we’re encouraged to shop, we’re needed as shoppers by our consumer-driven economy; we need to wake up and realize we’re being manipulated as much as humanly possible by marketers and the psychologists hired by the top guys in the retailing industries. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:23 pm
Underhill, 5 How. 1 (1846); The Incandescent Lamp Patent, 159 U. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:32 am
Schlegel offers some snapshots of individuals -- his take on Underhill Moore is unforgettable -- but Gross's book suggests an even more all-encompassing biographical vision offers additional insights. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am
Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51 and In re Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland: Abortion) [2018] UKSC 27 only applied to challenges to legislation, rather than challenges to policy or guidance [62]. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 10:20 pm
Further, future medical studies may re-open this issue if it is established that the risks to elderly people in such moves are greater than currently thought. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:50 pm
“If you’re not following these sources,” he continued, meaning the titular Top 5, “you could be missing things that are relevant and bear on your day-to-day practice. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 6:04 am
Cir. 2003), and In re Angstadt, 537 F.2d 498 (C.C.P.A. 1976). [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
Well, Kevin Underhill (@loweringthebar), the guy behind Lowering the Bar has written a book. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
We’re stunned. [read post]
