Search for: "In Re Underhill"
Results 21 - 40
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
The jury in the Paudie Coffey libel case has been unable to reach a verdict and it seems that there is likely to be a re-trial. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
In a re-post from The Privacy Perspective Blog, Suneet Sharma unpicks calls for the implementation of a federal privacy law in the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:32 am
Kevin Underhill says it well. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am
If you teach health law, come to the 40th Annual Health Law Professors Conference, June 8-10, 2017, at Georgia State University College of Law in Atlanta. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
” The letter called for a completely independent re-analysis of the PACE trial data, since the authors have refused to publish the results they outlined in their original protocol. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 3:05 am
I’m not sure why anyone would want to check out my own archives, but if you do, they’re here. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:50 pm
“If you’re not following these sources,” he continued, meaning the titular Top 5, “you could be missing things that are relevant and bear on your day-to-day practice. [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:56 am
He stated that “In a case like the present, the parties have made their own law by contracting, and can in principle un-make or re-make it”. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 3:13 am
After all, they’re just criminals, so who gives a damn. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 12:10 am
The Emergency Sasquatch Ordinance, by Kevin Underhill This costs more than a dollar, but it’d be great if more people read it, too. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 1:08 pm
I doubt we’re listening to the same folks, but the ones I’ve heard say “not all Muslims are terrorists” are talking about the problem of inferring group characteristics from what you know about only a few group members. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 3:24 am
And when they do bring charges, they’re generally doing so with good reason. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 12:57 pm
Today the Court of Appeal (Lady Justice Arden and Lords Justice Kitchin and Underhill) surprised us all by deciding, after dismissing TVC's appeal, that it was necessary to send the case back to Luxembourg for a further preliminary ruling of the CJEU, this time on the section 73 issue. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 2:27 pm
So now, they’re blogging. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 9:08 pm
” [Conor Friedersdorf, The Atlantic, earlier] San Diego says it retains discretion over when to release cop camera footage [Radley Balko] How body cameras can vindicate cops [same] Elderly Wisconsin man “was never considered dangerous, [but] was known to be argumentative,” so send in the armored vehicle [Kevin Underhill, Lowering the Bar, related] “The [SWAT-raided] Tibetan monks were here on a peace mission, for Christ’s sake. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 5:33 pm
You’re welcome. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 7:52 pm
(If you’re just joining us, on Day 1 we covered Pointless Declarations, and on Day 2 it was Old Laws Still on the Books.) [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 2:41 pm
You can’t be a polygamist, of course — at least for now — but you’re not supposed to even tell anyone about it. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:04 pm
If the detonation they’re worried about is a government test, I’m not sure a state measure could stop the federal government from testing if it could show it really needed to do so in Colorado. [read post]
