Search for: "In Re United States Parole Commission, Petitioner"
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Kalamazoo County Road Commission v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
United States, 14-29, a case seeking to clarify several standards regarding insider trading. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
United States, 14-29, have now been rescheduled three times. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
,” you’re right. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
United States, the Internal Revenue Service can tax as “local telephone service” under 26 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:42 pm
” Brief for United States 21. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
BRUGMANN, Petitioner, v. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The Bakanovases did not leave the United States, and in January 2007 they were arrested on immigration charges and released on bond. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
Petitioner's reply Title: Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:10 pm
Lopez (1995), United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
GARLAND GEORGE CURTIS, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Unopposed motion for continuance of resentencing hearing pending review in United States Supreme Court of decision of United States Court of Appeals which obligates trial court to impose 30-year sentence rather than 17-and-a-half-year sentence initially imposed for offense of production of child pornography for transportation into this country -- Motion granted -- Response to… [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am
Justice Alexander then noted that, should the continued viability of Standlee be directly presented to the supreme court during her tenure, he would be included to advance Justice Utter’s position in his dissent in that case, where he argued, “Where the sole reason advocated for petitioner’s violation of his parole is the commission of criminal acts upon which he has been adjudged not guilty by application of the beyond a reasonable doubt standard in the… [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied relief in an order entered January 8, 2009.[7] The Court was forced to reconsider its ruling when, on January 26, 2009, the United States Attorney’s Office announced that it had charged Judge Ciavarella and his mentor, Judge Michael T. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 5:22 am
Children born in the United States are U.S. citizens by birth, and are not subject to the immigration process involved in this program.Question: What if I am a widow(er) of a deceased U.S. citizen, and I live outside the United States? [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
Alexander, No. 071780 Following indictment against petitioner for criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) the state courts reasonably determined that petitioner had not made out a prima facie case; and 2) petitioner's post-conviction detention was not unlawful. . [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Bissonnette, No. 081094 In a conviction for first degree murder, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that: 1) the trial judge's instruction to the jury that the prosecution "does not have the burden of proving that no one else may have committed the murder" was an error that was contrary to clearly established Supreme Court precedent as stated in In re Winship; and 2) the trial court violated defendant's Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause… [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:52 am
" Consequently, a state drug offense punishable by more than one year qualifies as a "felony drug offense," even if state law classifies the offense as a misdemeanor. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Vasbinder, No. 06-2381 Grant of a habeas petition challenging a conviction and sentence for first-degree murder and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony is reversed as petitioner did not satisfy the gateway requirements for excusing a time-barred claim. [read post]
