Search for: "In Re United States of America, Petitioner" Results 21 - 40 of 246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2013, 9:37 pm
  Procedural HistoryUltimatePointer, L.L.C “filed two complaints in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas… alleged that Nintendo Co., Ltd., Nintendo of America, Inc., and several retailers that sell Nintendo products, infringe[d] the [U.S. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Respondent on April 12, 1994 filed a motion returnable April 27, 1994 seeking re-argument of the dispositional order dated April 7, 1994. [read post]
14 May 2007, 5:31 pm by Copper Cursive
I get several calls or emails through my website each month from women across the state that have been re-victimized by the same court system that is supposed to be protecting them. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 10:34 am
 "Petitioner Rumpole's motion for habeas corpus is denied as being both untimely, rude, and wrong. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 11:33 am by Paul Lomio
Always include the docket number, whether parenthetically (when there is a reported citation) or as the citation (when there is no reported citation): > Brief of Petitioner-Appellant at 48, United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:16 am by editor@howarddc.com
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Ninth Circuit) held oral argument in League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 2:47 pm by David T. Fischer and Sheela Ranganathan
Circuit Judge Kavanaugh, applied the Safeco reasoning to reach substantially the same result in United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:14 am by Ronald Mann
I should add, in the interest of candor, that I worked on the brief and presented oral argument on behalf of the United States in Dewsnup v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:46 am by Rumpole
 The United States of America has the greatest legal system in the world, built upon the principle that it is so unjust to convict an innocent individual that it is better that some guilty people go free. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 11:25 am by Dennis Crouch
  U.S. patents only cover infringement within the  territorial bounds of the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 6:15 am by Gene Quinn
  But the Supreme Court of the United States has very, very little mandatory jurisdiction. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:52 pm by John Bellinger
 Twenty-nine supplemental briefs were filed in mid-July in support of the plaintiff-petitioners, more than doubling the 14 briefs filed in support of the plaintiff-petitioners in the first round. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:40 am by Charlotte Garden
Across America, an intense debate is taking place over how states should structure their labor relations, and especially the extent to which state and local government employees should have the right to elect unions to represent them in collective bargaining. [read post]