Search for: "In Re Warner Communications Securities Litigation" Results 21 - 40 of 59
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
What I learned from comparing UMG, Sony, and Warner’s comments with those of other copyright owners advocating for increased duties for ISPs: I learned that the best filtering system is the one you’re not using. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Damages are limited to the difference between the purchase price and the value of the securities at the time of the suit. ■ Section 12(a)(2) creates liability for any person who offers or sells a security through a prospectus or an oral communication containing a material misstatement or omission. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
So, blocking orders: fine so long as they're reasonable! [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Katz's Request for Reference to Court of Appeal re "Mandatory Tariff" http://t.co/ZKNtuAtEjr -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-12-09: U.S. surveillance must be reformed, tech giants say http://t… http://t.co/3luSFRoEP6 -> Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation Coming Into Force in 2014: Are You Ready? [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 4:23 am by Louis M. Solomon
  For example, in the direct purchaser component of In re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, MDL Docket No. 1869, Misc. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 7:12 am by Steve Szentesi
  For example, an extensive federal omnibus crime bill was recently passed that will, among other things, significantly restrict conditional sentences (e.g., sentences served in the community for criminal offences) including for some criminal offences under the Competition Act. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 11:54 am by admin
  For example, an extensive federal omnibus crime bill was recently passed that will, among other things, significantly restrict conditional sentences (e.g., sentences served in the community for criminal offences) including for some criminal offences under the Competition Act. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:48 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Joining the phenomenal privacy and data security community of publications on The LexBlog Network, we have the debut of Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin's Data Breach Legal Watch. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Blum: there are technological answers to problems like security breaches. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 11:31 am by Adrian Lurssen
[By: Warner Norcross & Judd  |In: Tax Law, Trusts & Estates]20. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 6:14 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
Pornography, he points out, is sold by large and “mainstream” corporations like Time Warner and General Motors. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 4:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If it fails, Google will either have to litigate or lobby. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Inventive Step) Copyrighting a prior public disclosure: In re Lister (IP Directions) (IP Osgoode) A closer look at requests to stay section 337 investigations pending re-examination at the USPTO (ITC 337 Law Blog) Patent prosecution tips: drafting preambles (Patently-O)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: When are subsidiaries covered in a license agreement? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Inventive Step) Copyrighting a prior public disclosure: In re Lister (IP Directions) (IP Osgoode) A closer look at requests to stay section 337 investigations pending re-examination at the USPTO (ITC 337 Law Blog) Patent prosecution tips: drafting preambles (Patently-O) US Patents - Decisions CAFC: When are subsidiaries covered in a license agreement? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Inventive Step) Copyrighting a prior public disclosure: In re Lister (IP Directions) (IP Osgoode) A closer look at requests to stay section 337 investigations pending re-examination at the USPTO (ITC 337 Law Blog) Patent prosecution tips: drafting preambles (Patently-O)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: When are subsidiaries covered in a license agreement? [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
: TTAB says STEAM N’ MASH merely descriptive of process potatoes: In re ProMark Brands Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) WYHA? [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: New record for international trade mark registrations in 2008 but signs of slowdown at year end and possible negative annual income (WIPO) (IP Frontline) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) Chile and Peru join PCT (IP tango) (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) (WIPO) Community trade mark fees to be reduced (Class 46)… [read post]