Search for: "In Re ZTE CORPORATION " Results 21 - 40 of 46
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2019, 10:25 am
I am delighted to announce the publication of "Aligning Emerging Global Strategies to Combat Corporate Corruption," The International Lawyer 52(1)1-45 (2019). [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 12:18 pm by Julian Ku
In 2017, the U.S. imposed criminal penalties on Huawei competitor ZTE for an Iran sanctions breach (although those were later revised in a subsequent plea agreement).1In any event, both Huawei and Meng were almost certainly on notice that any re-sale of U.S. origin goods to Iran violated U.S. law. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:15 am by Erin Knese
In In re ZTE (USA), No. 2018-113, the court addressed two of the most common issues dogging appeals over the application of § 1400(b): whose law governs burden, and where does that burden lie. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:15 am by Erin Knese
In In re ZTE (USA), No. 2018-113, the court addressed two of the most common issues dogging appeals over the application of § 1400(b): whose law governs burden, and where does that burden lie. [read post]
15 May 2018, 1:10 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The same panel that recently decided In re ZTE (Fed. [read post]
9 May 2018, 3:00 am by Stewart Baker
 Some of those people are dissidents in authoritarian lands; many are authoritarian governments hacking secrets out of corporate networks. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:06 pm by Stewart Baker
Some of those people are dissidents in authoritarian lands; many are authoritarian governments hacking secrets out of corporate networks. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 10:30 am by Wenqing Zhao, David Stanton
The tariffs will likely be paired with new restrictions on U.S. investment by Chinese firms and mandatory review for transfers of sensitive technologies to foreign corporations. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 5:30 am by Andrew J. Grotto
Any release of controlled data to non-U.S. nationals within the security boundary of a corporate intranet … would be treated as a deemed export requiring appropriate authorization, as is the case today. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 8:01 am
There was thus a call to re-focus and re-emphasize the principle of proportionality and the specific circumstances of a case when tailoring remedies in patent cases, as set out in Recital 7 and Article 3 of the IP Enforcement Directive. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 4:06 am
 R 0003/15: surprising interpretation of feature violates right to be heardIn R 0003/15 of 28 November 2017 the EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal found the right to be heard of the patentee infringed, annulled the Technical Board's decision and sent the case back for re-hearing. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 11:02 am
Report on IPKat-BLACA panel discussion |  US patent litigation on the move again following In re Cray | Does the doctrine of equivalents apply to novelty? [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
Report on IPKat-BLACA panel discussion |  US patent litigation on the move again following In re Cray | Does the doctrine of equivalents apply to novelty? [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2017-02-18 https://t.co/v570H0KM9M -> Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2017-02-18 https://t.co/AG9Y9uJWsc -> SAP license fees are due even for indirect users, U.K. court says https://t.co/1YJdIH913c -> Link to SAP v Diageo software license case SAP UK Ltd v Diageo Great Britain [2017] EWHC 189 https://t.co/Z4rjq1BcWU) -> CASL’s private right action coming this summer: Are your corporate compliance policies up to the… [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 9:21 am
  It's website notes thatIn February, 2009, ZTE Corporation has formally become a member of the United Nations Global Compact. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Twitter has begun to comply with DMCA takedown requests relating to tweets, notably jokes, lifted in their entirety from someone's own account and re-tweeted without any attribution as to their original author. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
ZTE Corporation is ramping up to take advantage of the new legal environment that has resulted from the settlement between Qualcomm and the Chinese National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) over claims that the company’s licensing practices had violated the country’s Anti-Monopoly Law, recounts Neil.* Groundless threats to sue for IP infringement: the end of an era? [read post]