Search for: "In Re bridgestone/firestone Inc. Products Liabil."
Results 21 - 29
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2007, 1:34 pm
See In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, 611 F. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Target, Inc., 333 F. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 2:47 am
("No-injury" class actions are common in products liability.) [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
Hoffman-La Roche, Inc., 917 A.2d 767 (N.J. 2007), reversed another case (relied upon by the Appellate Division), finding it improper to apply New Jersey product liability (not consumer fraud) standards nationwide.While we correctly predicted the result, we were dead wrong about the rationale the supreme court chose to get there. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
Organon USA, Inc., 2007 WL 4365312 (D.N.J. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 3:23 am
So re judicata saves the day, just like the Illinois district court predicted in denying the requested injunction. [read post]
12 May 2006, 5:46 am
Attorney Tom Woodrow provided a detailed look, from the defense attorney perspective, of how structured settlements helped Bridgestone Firestone, Inc. evaluate and settle a series of cases relating to tire failures. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:11 am
We’re very aware of that issue, since Bexis had a hand in winning it in In re BridgeStone/Firestone, Inc. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Gibson Dunn already is seeing a surge in labor and employment, consumer fraud, and products liability litigation. [read post]
