Search for: "In The Matter Of: L.R" Results 21 - 40 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2023, 9:43 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
We first address our jurisdiction to hear this matter before turning to the merits. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 12:50 pm by Woodrow Pollack
 (NOTE: In my defense, that joint motion that I filed years ago did indicate that filings under seal would only be done according to local rule, but we revised the motion when we refiled it to explicitly incorporate the provisions of L.R. 1.09.) [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 4:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
 The Courts in Ontario will make the grant to an estate trustee who is recognized by the law of the domicile without inquiry into matters such as validity. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 7:26 pm by Carolyn E. Wright
L.R. 16-15.4 Many CACD judges will presumptively refer a case for option 2 or 3. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:54 am by Audrey Ah-Kan, Olswang
According to the case details on the Supreme Court website, the hearing will consider the Rule itself by addressing its limitations and its compatibility with the rule against double proof which states that there can only be one dividend in respect of what is substantially the same debt (In re Oriental Commercial Bank (1871) L.R. 7 Ch. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:27 am by Hull and Hull LLP
  In Re Hill (1870), L.R. 2 P & D. 89 (P.D.), the Court stated: “It is a general rule…that when a person dies domiciled in a foreign country, and the Court of that country invests anybody, no matter when, with the right to administer the estate, this Court ought to follow the grant simply because it is the grant of a foreign court, without investigating the grounds on which it was made, and without reference to the principles on which grants are made in this… [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 7:41 pm by Stephen Bilkis
There may be Article 78 proceedings in which, because of the urgency of the situation at hand and the difficulty of fairly protecting the interest of nonparty members of the class, a court may as a matter of discretion reject class treatment of the proceeding. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
There may be Article 78 proceedings in which, because of the urgency of the situation at hand and the difficulty of fairly protecting the interest of nonparty members of the class, a court may as a matter of discretion reject class treatment of the proceeding. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:22 am by The Legal Blog
In Kashi Nath (Dead) through L.Rs. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
L.R. (6th) 1, at para. 20, per Pentelechuk J.A.). [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 12:26 pm by Administrator
L.R. (6th) 1, at para. 34. [read post]