Search for: "In The Matter Of: S.C.R." Results 21 - 40 of 374
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2022, 12:55 pm by Goldfinger Injury Lawyers
Luckily for personal injury claimants, the evidentiary rules in personal injury cases are much different than the evidentiary rules in criminal matters. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Edward [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014, at para. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Edwards, 2001 SCC 60, [2001] 2 S.C.R. 1014, at para. 11, citing Hickey v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 8:10 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
, 1985 CanLII 69 (SCC), [1985] 1 S.C.R. 295 (“Big M”). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 8:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
On one hand, the common law has long protected the discussions and disclosures of cabinet members from disclosure on matters that are the subject of discussion at cabinet meetings. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:01 am by Administrator
Therefore, I see no utility in sending the matter back for redetermination. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Canada, 2005 SCC 54, [2005] 2 S.C.R. 601, at para. 10; Shaver-Kudell Manufacturing Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 7:02 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Ontario (Attorney General), 1990 CanLII 93 (SCC), [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1086, at p. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
., 2011 SCC 42, [2011] 3 S.C.R. 45, the S.C.C. explained that “core policy” government decisions — defined as “decisions as to a course or principle of action that are based on public policy considerations, such as economic, social and political factors” — must be shielded from liability in negligence. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
Newfoundland (Board of Commissioners of Public Utilities), 1992 CanLII 84 (SCC), [1992]1 S.C.R. 623 (SCC); R. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 7:41 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
, 1996 CanLII 215 (SCC), [1996] 2 S.C.R. 495. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 6:52 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Simpson, 2008 SCC 40, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 420, at para. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:00 am by Canadian Forum on Civil Justice
(New York: Center on International Cooperation, 2019), available at https://www.justice.sdg16.plus/. [3] R vs Brydges 1 S.C.R. 190 (1990). [4] For background, see e.g. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
The Canadian Copyright Licensing Agency (Access Copyright) is a copyright collective meaning that it manages certain rights on behalf of copyright holders. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 7:00 am by Jonathan Pyzer
Beaudry, 2007 SCC 5, [2007] 1 S.C.R. 190): R v RP at para 9. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 2:22 pm by Howard Knopf
  “Veni, vidi, vici”: Julius Caesar, 47 BC The more than ten-year-old effort by Access Copyright (“AC”) to impose a “mandatory tariff” through the Copyright Board on Canadian educational institutions is over in a quick, decisive, and devastating unanimous judgment from Justice Rosalie Abellaof the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”). 85 years of legislative policy and SCC jurisprudence are re-affirmed, vindicated, and continued. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 8:43 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Gladue, 1999 CanLII 679 (SCC), [1999] 1 S.C.R. 688 and R. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Re), 1998 CanLII 837 (SCC), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 27, at para. 21; Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 8:57 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Lucas, 1998 CanLII 815 (SCC), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 439, at para. [read post]
23 May 2021, 7:21 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In Tolofson, at p. 1049 S.C.R., La Forest J. explained the distinction as follows: [The real and substantial connection] test has the effect of preventing a court from unduly entering into matters in which the jurisdiction in which it is located has little interest. [read post]