Search for: "In re: 2703(d) Application"
Results 21 - 40
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2012, 12:20 pm
Image by Sean MacEntee via FlickrUnited States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Judge Liam O'Grady, in a three-page Memorandum and Opinion in In Re Application of the United States of America for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 2703(d) [Case No. 1:11-dm-00003-TCB], this week denied a request by Birgitta Jonsdottir, Jacob Appelbaum and Rop Gonggrijp to shield their Twitter account information from authorities seeking to prosecute… [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:08 am
§ 2703(d) have increased dramatically since 2014 in the District of Columbia alone. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:12 am
In re an in re The United States for an Order Authorizing the Release of Historical Cell-Site Info., 2010 U.S. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 7:22 pm
(Orin Kerr) On October 2, the Fifth Circuit will hold oral argument in case No. 11–20884, In Re Applications of the United States for Historical Cell-Site Data. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 12:18 am
At the 40-minute mark, Judge Sloviter suggests that judges have discretion to decline applications under 18 U.S.C. 2703(d). [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 3:07 pm
In re Application of United States for Search Warrant, 2009 WL 3416240 (D. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 10:44 pm
to Protect User from Warrantless Email Search. eff.org has the unsealed documents in In Re Application of the United States of America for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2703(d). [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:03 pm
” She concludes that the differences between the two provisions, which “apply to the production of the same type of records from the same type of providers,” indicate that Congress intended that the FISC apply a lower standard to the government’s Section 215 application than a court would in reviewing a Section 2703(d) request. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:04 pm
The government is seeking the records under 18 USC 2703(d), a provision of the 1994 Stored Communications Act that governs law enforcement access to non-content internet records, such as transaction information. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm
The best case in support of a due process right for a provider to challenge an assistance order is In re Application of the United States of America, 610 F.2d 1148 (3d Cir. 1979). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:39 pm
Some of these service-provider agreements could cast doubt on the validity of § 2703(d) in a given case; others might not. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 8:33 am
Garaufis rejected the government’s application for an order under Section 2703(d) of the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, which requires only that the government prove by use of “specific and articulable facts” that the location information sought is relevant and material to a criminal investigation. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
The § 2703(d) order covered 67 days of MetroPCS records. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 3:47 am
Related Cases: In Re Application of the United States of America for an Order Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2703(d)Apple Challenges FBI: All Writs Act Order (CA)Share this: Join EFF [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 6:44 am
Under one section of the law, 18 USC 2703(c)(1), the government can compel the production of internet communications metadata, such as the “to” and “from” information associated with emails, with either a search warrant or another type of court order (commonly described as a “d” order). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:04 pm
A federal magistrate judge amplified the issue in In re Cellular Telephones, 2014 WL 7793690 (D. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 9:17 am
§ 2703). [read post]
4 May 2008, 11:08 am
Four courts have rejected this, stating that as the SCA does not refer to real-time data, and the Pen/Trap statute gives no right to information tracking a user's location, the only way to grant the government access to such information is under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(d)(1), which requires a showing of probable cause before a search warrant is issued.13The government has also argued that there is no Fourth Amendment implication in the communication between the cell phone… [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:35 pm
” In re Application of U.S. for Historical Cell Site Data, 747 F. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 3:59 am
§ 2703(d), that provision addresses less-than-probable-cause orders, not full probable caused orders to be used in lieu of a search warrant. [read post]
