Search for: "In re: Kellogg Brown & Root" Results 21 - 40 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2017, 7:52 am by Beth Graham
See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 739-40 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) (explaining that under the doctrine of direct benefits estoppel, a non-signatory plaintiff seeking to benefit under a contract cannot avoid the contract’s arbitration clause). [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm by Alex Loomis
., Judge Krause’s concurrence in In re One2One Communications, LLC). [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm by Stuart Altman and Michelle Kisloff
Although the Target court does not explicitly state so, it appears to follow the “substantial purpose” version of the “primary purpose” test used by the court in In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F. 3d 754 (D.C. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm by Stuart Altman and Michelle Kisloff
Although the Target court does not explicitly state so, it appears to follow the “substantial purpose” version of the “primary purpose” test used by the court in In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F. 3d 754 (D.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 8:14 am by Beth Graham
See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, 166 S.W.3d at 737; ABB Kraftwerke Aktiengesellschaft, 115 S.W.3d 287 at 291. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supp. 3d 521 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) (applying Upjohn to protect internal investigation records, including witnesses communications); In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754 (D.C. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 8:12 am by Joy Waltemath
The court granted the motion for mandamus (In re: Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., August 11, 2015, Wilkins, R.). [read post]