Search for: "In re: P.S."
Results 21 - 40
of 984
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2009, 11:06 am
You've still got the indignity of thinking that you're married to a man for (here) thirty years that you're not really married to. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 8:20 am
p.s. [read post]
MICKEY KAUS: “When even crusading opinion journalists who work for The New Republic have to deny th…
1 Feb 2012, 5:02 am
… P.S.: I suspect polls will show Americans do care about social equality (that we are ‘equal in the eyes of each other,’ as Ronald Reagan put it). [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 6:32 pm
Now that we're back to the usual level of insanity at Barker Martin, P.S., we'll do our best to keep this blog updated more frequently. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:49 am
P.S. - This wouldn't be an problem, by the way, if you had objected below. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 11:16 am
P.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 4:09 pm
P.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 6:36 am
P.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 2:57 am
P.S. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 6:59 am
The term 'employee' shall not include applicants for employment or any other person.43 P.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
"P.S. - Can I tell you how annoying it is that even the docket sheet in juvenile cases is confidential? [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 10:32 am
P.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 2:52 pm
And they're worth everyone's time. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 2:35 pm
P.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 6:40 am
This is a re-occurring and incredibly frustrating ICWA fact pattern–if the ICWA compliant placement is out of state, or far away from the parents, and the goal is reunification, it makes sense for the tribe and state to allow for a non-compliant ICWA placement near the parents. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 9:05 pm
” [George Bennett, Palm Beach Post] P.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 12:18 pm
P.S. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
The ultimate result: the District Superintendent re-affirmed her previous decision "discontinuing [Capece's] probationary service. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:30 am
P.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2016, 7:54 am
In In re: Petition of the Borough of Downingtown, one of the issue that will be decided is: Where a municipality has satisfied the requirement to dispose of condemned property under Section 310(a) of the Eminent Domain Code by abandoning the purpose for which the property was condemned, does the Donated or Dedicated Property Act, Act of Dec. 15, 1959, P.L. 1772, 53 P.S. [read post]