Search for: "In re: S.A"
Results 21 - 40
of 685
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2023, 3:54 am
"]In re The Trustee of the Markeeta E. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 11:52 am
” In re Bard IVC Filters Prod. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
The appeals court first explained that the district court erred in construing Goldman’s generic statements of Business Principles in conjunction with the challenged statements about conflicts controls because those statements were made “in separate reports at separate times” with no evidence that the statements “piggyback[ed]” off each other.[7] The court observed that “[s]ecurities law provides no . . . cover” for inactionable general statements to… [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
(Lafarge) and Lafarge Cement Syria S.A. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
The EU Sustainability Directive and Jurisdiction The Draft for a Corporate Sustainable Due Diligence Directive currently contains no rules on jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
For example, in March 2023, the SEC entered into a $55.9 million settlement with Vale S.A., a publicly traded Brazilian mining company, to resolve charges related to the company’s “allegedly false and misleading disclosures about the safety of its dams prior to the January 2019 collapse of the Brumadinho dam that killed 270 people. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am
Bauman (2014) and Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 2:20 pm
Mexichem Amanco Holdings S.A., 865 F.3d 1348, 1355 (Fed. [read post]
31 May 2023, 9:33 am
We’re here to help whistleblowers maximize their opportunity to receive a financial bounty. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
Federal Court re tax. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 7:10 am
The CAFC in In re Societe Generale des Eaux Minerales de Vittel S.A., held that "it is necessary that the purchasers perceive the mark as a place name and this is where the question of obscurity or remoteness comes to the fore. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 8:19 am
’ Intermetal Mexicana, S.A. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:28 am
At the very end, if they were to have standing and to prove harm, there would be the question of whether they're entitled to an injunction. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 3:30 am
" In re Oxiteno S.A. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:09 am
"] March 14, 2023 - 10:30 AM [In-person]: Audemas Piquet Holding S.A. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
On Thursday, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals held a hearing on whether Rep. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
Dep’t of Justice, Re: Amenability of the President, Vice President and Other Civil Officers to Federal Criminal Prosecution While in Office, at 36 (Sept. 24, 1973) (“With respect to his responsibility as tie breaker his immunity from prosecution should be analogized to that of Members of Congress under Article I, section 6, clause 1 of the Constitution. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 3:49 am
Meliá is exploiting several hotels located on land owned by Gaviota S.A., a Cuban company owned by the Republic of Cuba. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:37 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. (2d Cir. 2017) (holding "rectangular metal plate affixed to the toe of LVL's sneakers" is a product design feature only protectable with secondary meaning).Courts and examiners are also likely assessing trademark spaces to some degree when they evaluate the inherent distinctiveness of logos and product packaging trade dress. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 1:02 pm
” The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida recently held in In re Inmobiliaria Tova, S.A., No. 20-24981-MC, 2021 WL 925517, at *7 (S.D. [read post]
