Search for: "In re: Watkins" Results 21 - 40 of 717
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2009, 6:29 am
  But today Latham & Watkins sent a memo around that makes me feel like something has changed materially in the large firm market. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:31 am by Steve Hall
But there’s little question that his remarks will re-energize debate about capital punishment and scrutiny of Watkins’ performance as the county’s top law enforcement officer. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 10:03 am by scanner1
JARRID THOMAS WATKINS, Petitioner and Appellant, and JOHN C. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 2:16 pm
"DA right to re-examine death penalty cases," is the title of an editorial in today's paper.District Attorney Craig Watkins does not want to see an innocent man executed on his watch. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:12 pm
Or Latham & Watkins, which has taken your case pro bono? [read post]
This post is based on a Latham & Watkins Corporate Governance Commentary, and relates in part to the recent decision in In re Revlon, Inc. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 7:21 am
Chuck Nathan on Appraisal Rights In this podcast, Chuck Nathan of Latham & Watkins provides some insight into a recent Delaware case - In re: Appraisal of Transkaryotic Therapies (Del. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 2:58 pm
  LINK  Here's an excerpt:Dallas County District Attorney Craig Watkins told the press last week that he wanted to re-examine about 40 death penalty cases in his county. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 9:05 pm
If you're at your computer (and perhaps in the office) at this late hour, you must be very bored. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 6:33 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Watkins' re-election in 2010 was decided on turnout and straight ticket voting. [read post]
27 May 2009, 8:04 am by Jessica Smagacz
He said, “First thing that crossed through my mind: there’s no need to rush it to where you’re going. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:34 am by Gabrielle Nagle
You blow the whistle because you’re optimistic that the person you’re speaking truth to power to is going to listen and right the ship”. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:39 pm
(Wilson, supra, 28 Cal.4th at p. 817; accord, Sheldon Appel, at p. 885; In re Marriage of Flaherty (1982) 31 Cal.3d 637, 650; see also Zamos, supra, 32 Cal.4th at p. 970.). [read post]