Search for: "In re A.C" Results 21 - 40 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2016, 3:48 am
September 12, 2016 - 11 A M: Luxco, Inc. v Consejo Regulador del Tequila, A.C., Opposition No. 91190827 [Opposition to registration of TEQUILA as a certification mark for "distilled spirits, namely, spirits distilled from the blue tequilana Weber variety of agave plant," on the ground that the mark fails to serve as an exclusive indicator of geographic origin].September 13, 2016 - 10 AM: In re NTVB Media, Serial No. 86174087 [Section 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal… [read post]
19 May 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
., [1909] A.C. 488 (H.L.). [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:04 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
Finally, as a means to promote wider and meaningful civil society participation, we respectfully request the re-opening of the accreditation process for stakeholders that missed the opportunity to register at the start of the AHC discussions. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 6:44 pm by Jon Gelman
Warehouse (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)BBC reports poor working conditions in Amazon warehouses (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Workers' Comp will cover hijacked UPS driver with PTSD (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)Hillary Clinton calls for re-authorization of Zadroga Act (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)More Workers Are Claiming 'Wage Theft' (workers-compensation.blogspot.com)USC researchers have found some scary by-products in electronic cigarettes. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 8:56 pm
Livingston, [1965] A.C. 694 (P.C.). [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 4:21 pm by Parks, Chesin & Walbert
If you have questions about a situation such as this, whether you’re an employer or an employee, make sure you’re getting reliable answers by talking to an experienced Atlanta sexual harassment lawyer. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 10:18 am by NARF
Gilliland (Tribal Sovereign Immunity) In re S.H. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:30 am
Defendant again sought vacatur of the reinstated judgment, and over State Farm's opposition this time, Queens Civil vacated the twice reinstated default judgment.The Appellate Term REVERSED and reinstated the default judgment, holding:A party seeking to vacate a default judgment must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense to the action (see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; see also Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v A.C. [read post]