Search for: "In re APPEAL OF MCNEAL."
Results 21 - 24
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2012, 3:01 pm
The case is In re: McNeal. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 9:27 pm
She wrote:[64] Re Eve [[1986] 2 SCR 388,] is not instructive about what “proof of incompetence” means. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 3:16 am
When the to-be-anticipated conviction results, Szorady appeals, arguing that he was forced to represent himself because of legitimate concerns about his appointed counsel. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:26 pm
McNeal was entitled to counsel. [read post]
