Search for: "In re Answers Corp. Shareholders Litigation" Results 21 - 40 of 114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2022, 12:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The answer has to do with merger objection class action lawsuit filings. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
       Federal Forum Selection Clauses: the Answer to Cyan? [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:09 pm by Francis Pileggi
June 23, 2020), in which Delaware’s High Court answered a question on this topic certified from the U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The pandemic seems like the likely explanation for the lulls, but that answer seems less convincing for the lull during the fourth quarter. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:25 am by Peter Mahler
Yelp reports that 60% of closed restaurants won’t re-open. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:45 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In a few months, the four ousted directors lined up sufficient proxies to first re-elect themselves to the Board and then remove both Greed and Sidekick from the Board. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 5:40 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Majority shareholders answer that the minority shareholder was ousted due to his own misconduct, so he is a bad faith petitioner with no right to seek dissolution. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
One answer from one search, even if it seems to be “on point, on all fours,” may foreclose consideration of other crucial corporate governance disciplines. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
These funds tend to select reorganization deals where controlling shareholders have incentives to keep prices low and the consideration for minority shareholders merger price is believed to be too low. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 9:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Shareholder Derivative Lawsuits: In addition to the eleven coronavirus-related securities class action lawsuits, there have been two COVID-19-related shareholder derivative lawsuits filed. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
      MOOTNESS FEES The Delaware Court of Chancery’s 2016 decision in In re Trulia, Inc. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:16 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
Lubin Austermuehle’s Oak Brook and Chicago shareholder oppression lawyers have over thirty-five years of experience litigating complex class action, consumer rights, and business and commercial litigation disputes. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 5:05 am by Eugene Volokh
While I am sure this litigation will twist and turn in a variety of ways, I see two primary issues with enforcing the religious arbitration agreement in this case: [I.] [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Allowing for an interlocutory appeal here would allow the Court of Appeals to answer this threshold legal question at the outset and potentially avoid the expenditure of further resources by the Court and the parties. [read post]