Search for: "In re Appeal of Phillip Morris"
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm
In light several key court of appeals decisions prior to Dukes (including the Second Circuit in In re IPO Securities Litigation, the Third Circuit in In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation, and even the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in Dukes itself), this analytical model is not groundbreaking, but Dukes puts an end to any possible reluctance by the federal courts to resolve an issue of fact simply because it might overlap with the merits. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:25 am
The vast majority of BPAI decisions involve a patent applicant appealing an examiner's final rejection and the most common patentability issue on appeal is obviousness. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
TTAB affirms trifusal of NATIONAL QUICK SALE for Real Estate Services: In re National Real Estate Solutions, Inc. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:25 pm
Sixth Circuit also considering appeal of challenge to tobacco law; lower court struck down ban on colors and images in ads but let the warning label requirements stand. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 10:45 am
Cir. 2005); In re Morris, 127 F.3d 1048, 1054 (Fed. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
That last point, the runaway jury awarding punitive damages on its own volition, particularly troubles us, because in Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
But in Phillips v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:17 am
” In re Morris, 127 F.3d at 1056 (emphasis added). [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
7 May 2010, 11:11 am
See In re Morris, 127 F.3d 1048, 1055 (Fed. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike’s Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
: In re Intellectual Property Development Corporation Pty Ltd (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) opposition to B-MORE for clothing: Nike, Inc v Gregory A Bordes (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB reverses section 2(E)(2) refusal of CATALINA ISLAND GRANOLA: goods/place association lacking: In re Zeller (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks - Lawsuits and strategic steps Cold War Museum - CAFC holds argument in appeal from THE COLD… [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 1:39 am
High Court Dismisses Philip Morris Appeal of $79 Million Punitive Damages Verdict
Legal Times
The U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:56 am
Report From This Morning’s Argument At the argument, Daniel Collins represented Phillip Morris, and Mark Robinson represented the plaintiffs. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Philip Morris appealed, and for the third time, the high court took the case. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 6:30 pm
Plaintiffs, Lorillard Tobacco Company, Phillip Morris USA Inc., and R.J. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
In the aftermath of Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
At Balkinization re: Spygate: "Finally, the Senate Judiciary Committee to Investigate Videotape Destruction". [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 5:06 am
In 1998, plaintiffs filed a class action against Phillip Morris, R.J. [read post]
