Search for: "In re Appeal of Visser" Results 21 - 40 of 84
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2020, 1:27 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
” What is your opinion about the draft bill and the German intention to re-ratify the UPCA as soon as possible? [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 2:56 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
So a simple re-run of the previous approval law with the same UPCA text will not work. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:21 am
According to the Board of Appeal, the stumbling block here was prior art relating to the use of cookies -- which the US Patent and Trademark Office had not considered in its own re-examination proceedings. [read post]
  As has been made clear by the Court of Appeal in cases such as R v Foreign Secretary (No. 2) [2010] EWCA Civ 158, the purpose of providing an embargoed draft to the parties is not to enable them to re-argue the merits of the case. [read post]
Nevertheless, the Court of Appeal is also hearing cases and in at least one of those cases, a judgment has been handed down. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:51 am
We have had to shed a history of separate national trade mark cultures in order to adopt a new order, and we're getting there, he said. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 1:58 pm by Thorsten Bausch
What has interested me for this blog is how the European standard for re-establishment, i.e. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In this case a request for re-establishment of rights had been filed but the Board decided that this request was superfluous. [read post]
A second instance decision is “re-examination” and not examination, as also indicated in Opinion #00016/2023/CGPI/PFE-INPI/PGF/AGU – published in BRPTO´s Official gazette #2762 on December 12, 2023 – when addressing formal issues to administrative appeals. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 4:26 pm by Rik Lambers (Brinkhof)
There may be some haggling about the amount of the winner’s bill (we’re still Dutch), and the court may lower the bill somewhat in view of reasonableness and fairness (not just because we’re Dutch, but because of Art. 14 of the EU Enforcement Directive). [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 5:49 am by Binxin Li
In response, LG Electronics initiated an invalidation action before the Patent Re-examination Board (PRB), challenging the validity of the ’855 Patent. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:33 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Despite several requests from the Staff Representation to be re-involved in the selection procedure (see enclosure), the term of office of the chair and vice-chairs apparently was renewed in October 2020. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 1:33 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
Despite several requests from the Staff Representation to be re-involved in the selection procedure (see enclosure), the term of office of the chair and vice-chairs apparently was renewed in October 2020. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 12:15 pm by Kluwer Patent blogger
More from our authors: Vissers Annotated European Patent Convention by Derk Visser, Laurence Lai, Peter de Lange, Kaisa Suominen€ 105 Overview of the Appeal Proceedings according to the EPC, Third Edition by Hugo Meinders, Philipp Lanz, Gérard Weiss€ 95 Global Patent… [read post]
Number of appeals against an examiner’s decision of refusal and the rate of success in such appeal The number of appeals against an examiner’s decision of refusal has decreased[2]page 30, but on the other hand, the rate of appeals succeeded has increased[3]page 31 over the past ten years. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:28 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
(ii) EBA members are appointed by the Administrative Council, but only for a five year period, and their re-appointment again depends on the AC’s consent and goodwill. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 10:43 am by Arnie Clarke
The Third Step – Appeal to the Court of Appeal Again unsatisfied with the decision of Arnold J in the High Court, Professor Shanks obtained leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal. [read post]