Search for: "In re Appeal of Visser"
Results 21 - 40
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2022, 1:35 am
The panel of judges will consist of Klaus Grabinski, Camille Lignières (legally qualified judge at the UPC local division in Paris), and Patrik Rydman (technically qualified judge). [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 3:08 am
Number of appeals against an examiner’s decision of refusal and the rate of success in such appeal The number of appeals against an examiner’s decision of refusal has decreased[2]page 30, but on the other hand, the rate of appeals succeeded has increased[3]page 31 over the past ten years. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 4:27 am
The judgment After losing in first instance, Abacus appealed to the Swedish Patent and Market Court of Appeal (case number PMT 8284-20). [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 6:04 am
Celgene timely appealed. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 6:12 am
Breaking News: The President of the Boards of Appeal and the President of the Office jointly propose to the Administrative Council to re-locate the Boards of Appeal from Haar to the building Pschorr-Höfe 7 in Munich, owned by the EPO, as of 2025/2026. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 8:55 am
Fourth, the EPO Boards of Appeal remain competent as is. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 8:02 am
Case date: 15 April 2021 Case number: J 0001/20 Court: European Patent Office (EPO), Board of Appeal A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:45 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has decided in granting Juniper’s motion for a writ of mandamus. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:45 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has decided in granting Juniper’s motion for a writ of mandamus. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 4:34 pm
The 2010 decision should therefore be considered res judicata in these new proceedings between the parties. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:07 am
” You’re the editor of the Wolters Kluwer publication ‘Patent Protection for Second Medical Uses’. [read post]
10 May 2021, 3:57 pm
(2) Which (disciplinary) authority should the majority of the members of the Enlarged Board of Appeal better not be subjected to when it comes to their re-appointment after their 5 year term? [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 8:00 am
The aim of my work was (and is still), essentially, to insist on the need to (re)take the right road, despite what I like to call “the DABUS Joke”. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 2:31 am
The aim of my work was (and is still), essentially, to insist on the need to (re)take the right road, despite what I like to call “the DABUS Joke”. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 3:09 am
Without expedition, the appeal before the TBA was not expected to be heard until early 2022. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 4:26 pm
There may be some haggling about the amount of the winner’s bill (we’re still Dutch), and the court may lower the bill somewhat in view of reasonableness and fairness (not just because we’re Dutch, but because of Art. 14 of the EU Enforcement Directive). [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 11:46 pm
Likewise, procedures to appeal decisions on essentiality of approved SEPs should be fast and cheap. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:28 am
The Federal Circuit also remanded the case for re-trial. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:04 am
Future topics lined up for harmonisation over the coming years include the accordance of a priority date, re-establishment of rights, claim drafting and structure, and computer-implemented inventions. 4. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:33 am
Despite several requests from the Staff Representation to be re-involved in the selection procedure (see enclosure), the term of office of the chair and vice-chairs apparently was renewed in October 2020. [read post]
