Search for: "In re Application of Johns"
Results 21 - 40
of 6,536
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2023, 11:01 am
This post was authored by John Speciale, Touro University Jacob D. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 6:24 pm
In re Eolith Co., Serial No. 78139104 (February 9, 2007) [not precedential].There was no debate that Applicant's product was not an "electronic computer game. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 8:42 am
John states that his 2002 torture opinion was "reviewed, edited and re-written by the assistant attorney general in charge of the office at the time [Jay Bybee], as is the case with all opinions that issue from OLC. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:33 am
The Board held that the phrase ONCE A MARINE, ALWAYS A MARINE would be perceived merely as informational and does not function as a trademark for Applicant's clothing itemsText Copyright John L. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 10:30 pm
"Text Copyright John L. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 6:12 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 8:28 am
The AFB can be included in this discussion if the disagreement “pertains to the general interpretation or application of a core provision” of the MOU. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 3:25 am
Some interesting strategic decisions were made here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 4:56 pm
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:20 am
In re John Michael Brack, Serial No. 85483943 (March 31, 2015) [precedential].Examining Attorney Amy E. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 11:42 pm
" In re ic! [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
In Re McCaughey & Anor [2011] UKSC 20 the Supreme Court, Lord Rodger dissenting, accepted the applicability of the Human Rights Act 1998 to the operation of inquests into pre-Human Rights Act killings. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 12:39 am
J. 875 (2007)), Professor John R. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 10:30 pm
Unlike a stack of Gratnell's trays, such decisions are few and far between.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 9:53 pm
Here are a few more points on the coverage of the first Office Action in the re-exam of the WARF patents on stem cells.I. [read post]
Trademark Reporter Commentary: "USPTO Snuffs Out Marijuana Dispensary Service Mark Application ...."
27 Oct 2016, 4:15 am
There may still be some daylight to challenge the underlying basis of the TTAB’s decision regarding the application of the Controlled Substance Act to applicants who are legally exercising their right to sell marijuana under state lawRead comments and post your comment here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:24 am
In re Kao, ___ F.3d ___ (Fed. [read post]
1 May 2023, 8:06 pm
In re: Stowman involves a boating accident and the application of maritime law. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 4:36 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
