Search for: "In re Application of Rodgers"
Results 21 - 40
of 96
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
Lord Rodger’s dictum in Re Guardian News and Media In Re Guardian News and Media, the Supreme Court discharged anonymity orders granted by the Treasury to individuals whose assets had been frozen on the grounds of suspected facilitation of terrorism. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am
The summary given on hand down (given by Lord Sumption) is here: Lords Wilson and Kerr, dissenting, took view that Lord Rodger in In re Guardian News and Media Ltd was stating a legal presumption that courts should act on the basis that most people believe that someone charged with an offence is innocent until proven guilty, but that he had offered no evidence or authority to support such a presumption. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 2:18 am
The minority, take the view that Lord Rodger in In re Guardian News and Media Ltd was stating a legal presumption that courts should act on the basis that most people believe that someone charged with an offence is innocent until proven guilty, but that he had offered no evidence or authority to support such a presumption. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 7:38 pm
Director Coats and Admiral Rodgers, they'll mostly be directed to you gentlemen, and thank you for your testimony this morning. [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 4:03 am
As Lord Rodger said at paragraph 63 of In re Guardian News & Media Ltd [2010] UKSC 1: “What’s in a name? [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Hajduk and Rodger C. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
” Rodgers offers a hasty interjection. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:58 am
Most important of those critics was Martin Rodger QC, Deputy President of the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), who tried to row back from 69 Marina in Barrett v Robinson [2014] UKUT 332 (LC); [2015] L&TR 1 (link to our note)* and limit the circumstances in which it could be used, but, ultimately, the Court of Appeal are binding on the UT, so we’re stuck with it. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
The latter include heat and steam treatments, measures that are effective but notably do not prevent re-infestation. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:30 pm
We’re just trying to help you stay on the high side of the law. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 1:56 pm
Certainly that is how Martin Rodger QC, the Deputy President of the UT, approached matters. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 1:56 pm
Certainly that is how Martin Rodger QC, the Deputy President of the UT, approached matters. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 10:32 pm
Stay tuned, we’ll keep you posted on developments with this interesting non-traditional trademark application. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 8:56 pm
The new Deputy president of the UT(LC), Martin Rodger QC, has been busy in this area recently, bagging himself a brace of decisions this month to go with one from July which it is high time we covered.Starting then with Arora, re: 68B Maud Road [2013] UKUT 362 (LC).The appellant, Ms Arora, was the freeholder of 68B Maud Road. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 8:56 pm
The new Deputy president of the UT(LC), Martin Rodger QC, has been busy in this area recently, bagging himself a brace of decisions this month to go with one from July which it is high time we covered.Starting then with Arora, re: 68B Maud Road [2013] UKUT 362 (LC).The appellant, Ms Arora, was the freeholder of 68B Maud Road. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:06 am
NO. 44/2001 applicable in respect of an action for a negative declaration in tort matters? [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
Rodgers, 12-382, back for its sixth relist. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
Rodgers, 12-382 (state-on-top), Burt v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Rodgers, 12-382, concerns the “clearly established” standard in Section 2254(d), asking whether Faretta v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
In their brief, Royal Dutch and Shell emphasized the canon of statutory construction that, “When a statute gives no clear indication of an extraterritorial application, it has none. [read post]
