Search for: "In re B. Children"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2020, 9:37 am
So, my gentle little reminder is this : Re B-S and all that good law from 2013 and onwards STILL APPLIES. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 10:01 am
” In re Marriage of Takata, 709 NE 2d 715 – Ill: Appellate Court, 2nd Dist. 1999 It does not matter if the other parent covered the children during the period where the parent failed to properly insure the children. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 12:14 pm
Appellate Court Juvenile Law Slip Opinion: In re Niya B. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm
Custodial parents rarely consider whether their spouses are prone to work related relocations when they decide to (re)marry. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:45 am
In re Kierra B. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 3:51 am
As explained by the majority in In re B, an appellate court is not required to conduct a fresh evaluation of whether a care order is necessary and proportionate. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 2:31 pm
” 750 ILCS 60/215(b)(7) The parent tendering the children to the other parent is usually obligated to be the bigger person. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:24 am
B. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 5:59 am
” 750 ILCS 5/503(b) If the marital property is no longer in the control or possession of either spouse because it has been gifted to a child. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:49 am
In re Custody of E.A.T.W. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Whatever stage you're at in choosing a legal guardian, consider these additional three steps that may help ensure your children are well cared for. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 12:57 am
(b) The Government consider whether the Adoption Act 2009 (Qld) should similarly reflect the 2018 amendments to the Adoption Act2000 (NSW), expecting children to be permanently placed through out of home adoptions within 24 months of entering the department’s care. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 12:57 am
(b) The Government consider whether the Adoption Act 2009 (Qld) should similarly reflect the 2018 amendments to the Adoption Act2000 (NSW), expecting children to be permanently placed through out of home adoptions within 24 months of entering the department’s care. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 2:24 pm
(b).) [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:27 pm
We’re pleased to announce a new scholarship fund, the Helen B. and Lewis E. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 4:58 am
For that reason LM v Medway Council (2007) EWCA Civ 9, (2007) 1 FLR 1698, R v B CC Ex p P (1991) 1 WLR 221 CA (Civ Div), P (A Minor) (Witness Summons), Re (1997) 2 FLR 447 CA (Civ Div) and W (Children) (Care Order: Sexual Abuse), Re (2009) EWCA Civ 644, (2009) 2 Cr App R 23 should be overruled. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 1:41 pm
The Consumer Product Safety Commission has amended the CPSIA by exempting electronic products from the lead limitation provided by Section 101(b)(2) provided the component part is not accessible "if it is not physically exposed by reason of a sealed covering or casing and does not become physically exposed through reasonably foreseeable use and abuse of the product including swallowing, mouthing, breaking, or other children’s activities, and the aging of the product, as… [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 10:43 am
Inherently, these parents are asking their children to reject half of themselves, as all kids are essentially half parent A and half parent B. [read post]
31 May 2012, 1:30 am
In re Janessa R.K.B.E. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 8:41 am
"And here when we're talking about unrepresented children, children who have no legal representation, who fail to come to court — it's contrary to our basic concept of our legal system that we should impose a legal burden when there's no individual responsibility that we can assign to the child. [read post]
