Search for: "In re Berman (1989)"
Results 21 - 27
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
A brief review of the justifications usually given for the exclusions for marks that are scandalous or disparaging: (1) the harm done by the government endorsement represented by a registration; (2) the desire to withhold government resources from disparaging or scandalous terms; (3) the lack of any effect on a user’s ability or right to use the mark, with (a) possible §43(a) or state common law protection against confusing uses despite unregistrability, though this is not at all… [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Muscat by Berman v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Muscat by Berman v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
The Interplay between the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause: Is the Supreme Court’s Test for “Public Use” Merely Rational Basis? [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 8:30 pm
Frank Biden, listed as a senior advisor for Berman Law Group, was featured in the firm’s ad in the Daily Business Review along with quotes describing his relationship with the new president and their family name. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
” In re Shurley, 115 F.3d 333 (5th Cir. 1997), citing G. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
” In re Shurley, 115 F.3d 333 (5th Cir. 1997), citing G. [read post]
