Search for: "In re Charles C. (1999)" Results 21 - 40 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am by Christa Culver
Army Corps of EngineersDocket: 10-1059Issue(s): The court of appeals held in this case that land transfers by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to the State of South Dakota pursuant to the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 did not violate §§ 605(b)(3) and (c)(1)(B) of that Act because they did not include lands within the “external boundaries” of the Yankton Sioux Reservation. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:58 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Her recollection: "the state's argument re why Banks didn't deserve relief was rather stunning. [read post]
21 May 2007, 9:47 am
Res. __) (PDF 87.3 KB) Text of the resolution as introduced by Reps. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:28 pm
The American Banker reports that Charles Schumer favors consolidating regulation under a single agency. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
II § 2: http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.htmlEmily C. [read post]