Search for: "In re Child of Scott A." Results 21 - 40 of 790
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2023, 7:10 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
We thought that was a pretty long history, until Assistant Director for Reference, Clinics, and Outreach Laura Scott uncovered an even earlier holiday gift guide from Duke Law in the December 2, 1964 issue of The Devil's Advocate newspaper. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
He got too close and accidentally cut through the child’s shoe, piercing a toe. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:26 am by Joanna Herzik
If you’re interested we will like to run ALL excess proceeds recoveries through you, which means constant business! [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 9:53 am by Stewart Baker
We also note the continuing pressure on Apple to reconsider its refusal to adopt effective child sexual abuse measures. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am by David Pocklington
Readers will no doubt be familiar with the case of Dr Richard Scott (whom we have mentioned before, here, for example), who was given a warning by the General Medical Council in June 2012 after a patient complained that Dr Scott had abused his position to push his religion upon him. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 4:07 pm
For calendar year 2020, Scott’s child support obligations totaled $90,444 ($7,537 x 12 months). [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 2:16 am by Seán Binder
They’re not taking away my First Amendment rights. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:29 am by Naureen Shah
But the Trump administration re-signed the sheriff onto the program — and the Biden administration has so far refused to terminate the agreement. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 2:57 am by SHG
” How many Scott Greenfields are there? [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:32 am by Eugene Volokh
" So the government can presumably disarm dangerous convicted felons, whether they're incarcerated or not, without violating the Second Amendment. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
James Madison gave hardly any attention to the national executive before the convention, but as Bill Ewald has observed, Wilson came prepared to argue from the very start for “a single President, elected for a relatively short term, eligible for re-election, wielding a veto power, and enjoying authority independently both of Congress and of the legislatures of the states”—in short, for the very structure of the office that actually emerged from the proceedings. [read post]