Search for: "In re Clarence B."
Results 21 - 40
of 168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2022, 6:57 am
” Chief Justice John Roberts was preoccupied with what would happen under Geyser’s position if “one district decides they’re going to buy computers from computer company A and another says no, we’re going to buy them from B. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:04 pm
The order, representing all of the justices save Clarence Thomas, reads: Because the Court of Appeals concluded that President Trump’s claims would have failed even if he were the incumbent, his status as a former President necessarily made no difference to the court’s decision. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:54 pm
So, give me a reason why Congress would do something different in (B)(i) and (B)(ii). [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Then in division 12 subdivision B, the Court is empowered to issue a declaration of parentage that is conclusive for the purposes of all laws of the Commonwealth. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Then in division 12 subdivision B, the Court is empowered to issue a declaration of parentage that is conclusive for the purposes of all laws of the Commonwealth. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 5:16 am
But to reduce the Drug War to a product of Regan era racism, as Kendi does, is wildly oversimplistic, if for no other reasons than (a) various drug wars had been fought well before Reagan, including in places with few if any black people; (b) other, ethnically homogenous countries have also had drug wars; and (c) it was supported by liberal black legislators as much as anyone else. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:11 am
He observed that “people settle cases all the time where … they’re not going to admit they were liable, but they might agree to take actions. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 7:30 am
Barrett Prettyman, Wiley B. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
“… I think we’re going to put a good person in that race no matter who we choose …,” Fudge said. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 3:50 am
US Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas apparently is one of those brave souls. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 12:16 pm
Early in Marcus’ presentation, for example, Justice Clarence Thomas commented that the text of 13(b)(1) “seems to suggest that [it] is focused on forward-looking, preventing a future or a present action. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm
Answering machines were relegated to Seinfeld re-runs. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:26 pm
The TCPA defines an automatic telephone dialing system, or ATDS, as “equipment which has the capacity — (A) to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and (B) to dial such numbers. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
Justice Clarence Thomas is next. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 2:05 pm
The chief justice focused on the jurisdiction argument, and maintained that the court had held, contrary to what Jaicomo was arguing, that “if you make a determination under the merits, there isn’t the established jurisdiction against the United States, that they’re treated the same. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am
Justice Clarence Thomas dissented. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
” So if Remedy A would trigger a very complicated and close severability analysis and Remedy B would trigger an easy and obvious severability analysis, this distinction itself provides reason to prefer Remedy B.In the ACA context, at least upon superficial analysis, Remedy B (enjoining the 2017 tax repeal) wouldn’t seem to raise a difficult question at all; the tax-zeroing provision appears conceptually and functionally disjoined from other provisions of the TCJA, and… [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:05 am
Gorsuch and Justice Clarence Thomas appeared to agree. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm
Now we’re all caught up. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
El último presidente demócrata en haber nominado a un juez a la Corte Suprema había sido Lyndon B. [read post]
